I started to reply to the recent thread regarding a Lopi insert and how wonderful the blower improved that stove, then realized that it would be a bit of a hijack to ask this question there...
Ok - for an insert it makes quite a bit of sense that a blower would drastically improve performance since a good part of the stove may well be stuck in a wall. My question is how much of a real improvement does it make on a stove? In particular on a VC Encore NC.
I have noticed that a lot of the burn does happen in the back of the stove here - the everburn area seems to be the hottest part during much of the active part of the burn cycle (i.e. before coaling happens). Since the blower attaches back there I wonder if it may help to push air across the back and perhaps pull more heat from that area?
Anyone have the Encore NC or similar stove try running it with and without the optional blower and have results to report on it?
Thanks.
Ok - for an insert it makes quite a bit of sense that a blower would drastically improve performance since a good part of the stove may well be stuck in a wall. My question is how much of a real improvement does it make on a stove? In particular on a VC Encore NC.
I have noticed that a lot of the burn does happen in the back of the stove here - the everburn area seems to be the hottest part during much of the active part of the burn cycle (i.e. before coaling happens). Since the blower attaches back there I wonder if it may help to push air across the back and perhaps pull more heat from that area?
Anyone have the Encore NC or similar stove try running it with and without the optional blower and have results to report on it?
Thanks.