zhukpavlo said:Dolmar 5100 for $435 or Stihl 310 for $420
TMonter said:The difference is the MS310 isn't a "pro" saw it's a mid range saw.
That is A difference. The 310 is a whole class of saw bigger, too.
I agree the stock 5100 is a heck of a saw and on the other hand the stihl with just a muffler mod. will have big gains over the dolmerTMonter said:That is A difference. The 310 is a whole class of saw bigger, too.
But where the actual performance is, the Dolmar IMO is the better performer. Granted the 310 isn't a slouch but it's still a pretty heavy midrange saw compared to a light high revving pro saw.
One of the people I cut with has a MS310 he bought about 3 years ago and he likes it, it's a solid saw and has no complaints. On the other hand he said if he were to buy a new saw to replace it he'd get a 346XP NE or Dolmar-5100 because of the weight.
What really matters here is the actual power to the actual weight and in that realm I think the Dolmar has the edge, especially if you're going to run the saw stock.
TMonter said:That is A difference. The 310 is a whole class of saw bigger, too.
But where the actual performance is, the Dolmar IMO is the better performer. Granted the 310 isn't a slouch but it's still a pretty heavy midrange saw compared to a light high revving pro saw.
One of the people I cut with has a MS310 he bought about 3 years ago and he likes it, it's a solid saw and has no complaints. On the other hand he said if he were to buy a new saw to replace it he'd get a 346XP NE or Dolmar-5100 because of the weight.
What really matters here is the actual power to the actual weight and in that realm I think the Dolmar has the edge, especially if you're going to run the saw stock.
The 310 has almost 20% more displacement. The 5100 might achieve higher RPM, but it has to. Anyone ever dyno’d these saws? I think that might tell us a lot more than our conjecture and assertions.
TMonter said:The 310 has almost 20% more displacement. The 5100 might achieve higher RPM, but it has to. Anyone ever dyno’d these saws? I think that might tell us a lot more than our conjecture and assertions.
But that displacement comes at a cost of almost 20% more weight as well. I think overall the 5100 is just a better saw than the 310. The 310 is going to have a little more grunt pulling a longer bar but overall I think most people would be more pleased with the 5100.
The specs show that the Dolmar has almost the same power as the 310 and all of the people I've talked to who have run one against a 310 confirm that fact.
This isn't a Dolmar Vs Stihl debate it's a Pro versus Midrange saw debate. The 310 just isn't that spectacular of a saw in the Stihl lineup.
Adirondackwoodburner said:neither! i WOULD GO husquvarna!!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.