X25 vs X27 or Fiskars 8lb maul

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Hope everyone has a wonderful and warm Thanksgiving!
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
N

Nosetotail

New Member
Mar 3, 2016
67
Jacksonville, FL
Hi guys. I currently have an x25 and a standard 8lb maul. I have the maul sharpened to a decently narrow convex edge. The original edge was like a blunt wedge on the end. I alternate between the two, but am itching for something else to try. I originally got the 25 due to the descriptions saying that the 27 was for taller people, but now that I'm finding I can get significant power out of the 25, I'm having handle length envy. I'm 5'10" and so I'm wondering if going to the 27 would prove to be beneficial. Is there much difference in power between the 25 and 27.

On the same note, I just saw the Fiskars 8lb maul is available in the US. From their website, the price is 64.99 plus tax and shipping is 12.95 to NE Florida. Total: 82.49. Anybody used one of these.
 
I have a 25, 2X27's a Acme super splitter and a box store 8lb. I am your height. I go to the 27 automatically. It really is that much better than the 25 for me. Actually bought the 25 for my height challenged wife who tops out about 5'4". She even goes for a 27! On the other hand I plan on adding the new Fiskars 8lb to my collection as well. Good luck. Hard to go wrong either way.
 
Cannot speak for the 25 but I love my 27 and I am 5'10"
 
Nosetotail said:
On the same note, I just saw the Fiskars 8lb maul is available in the US. From their website, the price is 64.99 plus tax and shipping is 12.95 to NE Florida. Total: 82.49. Anybody used one of these.
Click to expand...
Yes, I've been using it paired with an X27 and find them to be a great combination. There's a recent thread where you can read more about the Fiskars maul and other axe/maul options.
 
I am 5' 9" and use the x27 as well. The extra 8" of handle compared to the x25 can only help. Just make sure to use a chopping block and swing correctly, so you don't catch your toes.
 
Well can anyone tell me what the head weight of the 25 and 27 is.? Are they the same head? I see a spec on the 27 that it totals 6.3 lbs. I would just like to know how much the head weighs so I can compare it to say the 6 lb head Wilton.
 
Last edited:
I'm 5-7 and I find the x27 works just fine for me.
 
I wish I had just gotten the 27 instead of the 25. Right now,, since I have had time to think about it, I can only justify one new tool for Father's day. Given that most of the wood I run across is somewhat knotty or twisted Oak of various varieties, I think I'm in the market for a heavy maul since I already have the x25.

So I would like a comparison between the Isocore and Wilton 8 lb maul. I'm leaning toward a Wilton with a 30 inch handle. It looks like the Fiskars spec is for total weight while the Wilton is 8 lbs plus the handle weight.

I am guessing that the edge profiles are comparable, but perhaps the edge goes to the isocore in that catagory. No pun intended. It looks like the isocore borrows it's edge shape from its smaller cousins. I'm just banking or hoping that the Wilton is borrowing it's edge profile from Fiskars.
 
Never tried the x25 but the 27 has a good sized handle in my book. It's about the same as my 8lb maul.

Apparently some people like to lift their rounds up to waist height and split it there. (I'd need a forklift to try that on the wood I'm splitting.). The x25 is a good size for that, from what I've read.

The x27 is nice but it's not the magic axe that you read about in its amazon reviews. I find it just about exactly as capable as my old fashioned 8lb maul. I do use it preferentially because it does the same work and is lighter.

I would be quite interested to try out the fiskars 8lb maul but after my experience with the x27, I don't think I will be shelling out for one.
 
I sure would like to see a closeup of the edge profile on the isocore. I can see a fat bevel characteristic with old fashioned mauls on the Wilton although I'm sure it is quite sharp for the angle it has. From what I can tell on the few pics I have found, the Isocore seems to have a narrower edge, similar to the x axes. I am waiting on replies from Wilton and Fiskars for the total weight of each, and the head weight of the Fiskars. On the few pics I have found for the Fiskars, I can almost see a hint of a hollow ground on its hips with a subtle bevel at the edge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vtcamp
Nosetotail said:
I sure would like to see a closeup of the edge profile on the isocore. I can see a fat bevel characteristic with old fashioned mauls on the Wilton although I'm sure it is quite sharp for the angle it has. From what I can tell on the few pics I have found, the Isocore seems to have a narrower edge, similar to the x axes. I am waiting on replies from Wilton and Fiskars for the total weight of each, and the head weight of the Fiskars. On the few pics I have found for the Fiskars, I can almost see a hint of a hollow ground on its hips with a subtle bevel at the edge.
Click to expand...

From the Fiskars website... you can browse all their thousands of website images here.

It looks like a regular smallish bevel to me. Of course once you get it you can put any edge you like on!

[Hearth.com] X25 vs X27 or Fiskars 8lb maul
[Hearth.com] X25 vs X27 or Fiskars 8lb maul
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darkimpulse
I have both the X27 and the Fiskars IsoCore Maul, and I find that the two complement each other nicely. The picture below shows a comparison of the heads, looking from underneath. You can see that the maul head is both wider and longer than the X27. The maul doesn't have the razor edge that you find on the X27, but it still beats my old no-name maul by a wide margin. The handle of the Fiskars maul is shorter than the X27's by maybe a couple of inches. I usually end up using the maul for initial splits of large and/or knotty rounds and then switch to the X27 to finish them off.
[Hearth.com] X25 vs X27 or Fiskars 8lb maul
 
  • Like
Reactions: cannonballcobb and Darkimpulse
Cool. That pic is exactly what I was trying to find. If you have access to an accurate scale, could you weigh the isocore. I have been waiting on a reply from Fiskars customer service on whether the 8 lb spec is head or total.

Incidentally, according to the Wilton customer service rep, the 30 and 36" 6 lb bash weighs in at 10 and 11 lbs and the 8 lb bash weighs in at 12 and 13 lbs. There is a lot of weight in those handles. I wonder how that affects the balance.

Now if I can find someone who has an x46 Spalthammer...
 
Nosetotail said:
Cool. That pic is exactly what I was trying to find. If you have access to an accurate scale, could you weigh the isocore. I have been waiting on a reply from Fiskars customer service on whether the 8 lb spec is head or total.
Click to expand...
The IsoCore weighs in at 4736 g (10.44 lb), with label still attached. :) That compares to 2549 g = 5.62 lb for my X27.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cannonballcobb and jetsam
I have the Wilton with the 8 lb head and 36 inch handle. It is a log splitting machine. Will go through anything. Last summer I used it to split oak rounds 36 plus inch diameter. I used it with a wedge to split in half the just the maul to split the halls smaller it went through it with ease. The rounds with no knots I didn't even use a wedge and it popped them. The weight and balance are great, plus you can use it to hit wedges. The head it just about as indestructible as the handle. I have tried to break it. If it does get broken you get a grand from Wilton. It is the best maul I have ever used and I've been splitting wood for a long time. It's pricey but worth it, it will be the last maul you ever buy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rowerwet and jetsam
heavy hammer said:
I have the Wilton with the 8 lb head and 36 inch handle. It is a log splitting machine. Will go through anything. Last summer I used it to split oak rounds 36 plus inch diameter. I used it with a wedge to split in half the just the maul to split the halls smaller it went through it with ease. The rounds with no knots I didn't even use a wedge and it popped them. The weight and balance are great, plus you can use it to hit wedges. The head it just about as indestructible as the handle. I have tried to break it. If it does get broken you get a grand from Wilton. It is the best maul I have ever used and I've been splitting wood for a long time. It's pricey but worth it, it will be the last maul you ever buy.
Click to expand...


92 and 103 for either of the 8 lb models on Amazon with free shipping doesn't sound bad, but 68 and free shipping for the Isocore sounds even better. I don't like the obtuse bevel on the Wilton, but I can thin that out a little if I have to. On the other hand, the hips on the Wilton look thinner overall compared to the Isocore.

This will come down to whether or not I think the 2 extra pounds of handle weight will transfer more energy to the wood, or will the difference be negligible. I do like the idea of a really light handle wielding such a heavy weight. I think that is part of all Fiskar's ax's success.

I think the tie breaker will be the Isocore handle. I'm not getting any younger and I really feel those bounce out hits.
 
The Wilton handle does a very good job a reduced vibration. My father has used it and at almost sixty he likes it. I never have used the other one but I love the bash I also have one of their sledgehammers they make a great product. To bad you can't try them both out before you buy. I know a lot have said they don't like the weight of the Wilton but they also have a six lb version. I think it's worth the extra forty or so dollars.
 
I have no doubt that the bash has reduced vibration, but I see no where in the design or in the advertisements that it reduces the hard shock you get when you encounter an immovable object like a good ole hard knotty twisted piece of oak. I'm not saying it doesn't, however the whole crux of the Isocore label is the shock absorbing handle. If you watch the promo video on their sledge hammer, there is a really good slow motion sequence showing the flex in the handle absorbing a hard shock. The toll on me really adds up quick with the hickory handled maul I'm using currently.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
8-lb vs. 6-lb Fiskars maul?
Replies
16
Views
3K
The Gear
Wisco Shepherd
Wisco Shepherd
siltsunrise
Fiskars X25 vs X27
Replies
12
Views
18K
The Gear
EbS-P
EbS-P
OhioBurner©
  • Locked
Putting up Helko Vario against the Fiskars X27
Replies
9
Views
8K
The Gear
OhioBurner©
OhioBurner©
R
  • Locked
Fiskars X25
Replies
11
Views
2K
The Gear
WoodpileOCD
WoodpileOCD
Ralphie Boy
  • Locked
Fiskars X25 or X27
Replies
23
Views
10K
The Gear
wood butcher
wood butcher
Top Bottom