As @BKVP and others can confirm, this year marks the 20th anniversary of this EPA/manufacturer/consumer merry-go-round BS...
As explained in the ancient The Florida Bungalow Syndrome article, if you have experienced a cracked stove, creosote buildup, short burn times, run away/over fire, chimney fire, combusters only lasting 1-2 seasons etc. then you have been victim of this bureaucratic idiocy.
The end user is always left holding the bag... Anything we do to remedy the situation is strictly vorboten:
From a risk perspective:
I'm 100% against more regulatory involvement but the current regulations are irrational and have us over a barrel.
Just give us the formulas / reference tables like everything else. The formula for calculating theoretical draft is simple enough. Adjust for local average winter ambient temperature, type of flue pipe and installation method and BOOM we are in the ball park. Two k-type thermocouples, a data logger and a manometer can all can be had for peanuts on Amazon. Heck even wide band O2 sensors are standard fare for the average automotive enthusiast if we want to go full EU emissions geek. Do the calcs, add in a couple of monitored test burns for fine tuning/user training/validation and voila! We have a fully commissioned, safe, functional installation that keeps the EPA dweebs happy.
Why is this so hard?
/rantff
As explained in the ancient The Florida Bungalow Syndrome article, if you have experienced a cracked stove, creosote buildup, short burn times, run away/over fire, chimney fire, combusters only lasting 1-2 seasons etc. then you have been victim of this bureaucratic idiocy.
The end user is always left holding the bag... Anything we do to remedy the situation is strictly vorboten:
- Key damper - EPA says no
- Smaller flue diameter - NFPA says no
- Flue restrictor - UL and NFPA says no
- Barometric draft control - Sweeps scream creosote, UL says only on tested devices, manufacturers say...?
- Modify the stove - EVERYONE says NO
- Plumbing contractors are required to perform DFU calculations for drain/vent sizing
- Electrical contractors are required to perform load/voltage drop/box fill calculations
- Framers are given prescriptive tables for common header/beam/fastening etc. Anything beyond 'cook book' can be done with engineering evaluation
- - and the really ironic one - -
- Natural gas appliances require draft testing and calibration during commissioning. Flue pipe diameter IS allowed to be sized down as needed with caution
From a risk perspective:
- plumbing is rather trivial, for most residential situations, worst case is property damage, not death
- Even the most egregious electrical errors are typically saved by breakers
- Framing code is super conservative and even the most bone headed mistakes (cutting joists nearly in half, cutting trusses etc) almost never result in catastrophic failure
- Natural gas appliances have multiple safeties in place with the default condition being full shut down unless conditions are met
- By contrast, LIGHTING A RAGING FIRE IN STEEL BOX IN THE MIDDLE OF YOUR HOUSE? meh, send it bro.
I'm 100% against more regulatory involvement but the current regulations are irrational and have us over a barrel.
Just give us the formulas / reference tables like everything else. The formula for calculating theoretical draft is simple enough. Adjust for local average winter ambient temperature, type of flue pipe and installation method and BOOM we are in the ball park. Two k-type thermocouples, a data logger and a manometer can all can be had for peanuts on Amazon. Heck even wide band O2 sensors are standard fare for the average automotive enthusiast if we want to go full EU emissions geek. Do the calcs, add in a couple of monitored test burns for fine tuning/user training/validation and voila! We have a fully commissioned, safe, functional installation that keeps the EPA dweebs happy.
Why is this so hard?
/rantff