Clearances to Combustibles Theory

wkpoor Posted By wkpoor, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:23 PM

  1. wkpoor

    wkpoor
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Oct 30, 2008
    1,854
    82
    Loc:
    Amanda, OH
    Just another reason why being UL tested doesn't mean crap to me. A product having the label or tag is not a bad thing. It just doesn't garantee the product is truely safe IMO and certainly says nothing about quaility.
     
  2. tfdchief

    tfdchief
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Nov 24, 2009
    3,336
    1,295
    Loc:
    Tuscola, IL
    wkpoor, being an inspector, I think you underestimate UL. But then there is nothing wrong with evaluating your product and situation and maybe going above and beyond what the testing lab specifies. I for one would have paid extra for a ceiling support box with MORE than the 2 inches clearance to combustibles required by the UL testing and label, but of course that is not available. I went above and beyond all requirements except that one......had no control over that. Well, looking back now, I could have framed the support box with metal studs but I didn't think of that at the time.
     
  3. northernontario

    northernontario
    Member 2.
    NULL
    

    Sep 28, 2010
    120
    10
    Loc:
    Ontario
    My previous stove was set up the same, except I also had a damper on the stove pipe in the 45° section... I think pulling it from the pipe when I did this install improved my draft a bit.

    I went in search of some real 45° elbows, none found in a 200km radius. My one 90° elbow, I'd love to redo in 2x45° sections to give it a larger bend radius. I'm still curious what has less draft restriction (and probably less air leakage), the adjustable 90° elbow, two adjustable 45° elbows, or the 90° corrugated fixed elbow.

    But now I'm off-topic.
     
  4. wkpoor

    wkpoor
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Oct 30, 2008
    1,854
    82
    Loc:
    Amanda, OH
    But now I'm off-topic

    As the OP I say carry on. I too have never seen a fixed 45. Having 2 or more adjustables seems bound to increase the leaks and or run a cooler pipe.
     
  5. begreen

    begreen
    Mooderator 2.
    NULL
    
    Staff Member

    Nov 18, 2005
    61,380
    7,831
    Loc:
    South Puget Sound, WA
  6. wkpoor

    wkpoor
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Oct 30, 2008
    1,854
    82
    Loc:
    Amanda, OH
  7. northernontario

    northernontario
    Member 2.
    NULL
    

    Sep 28, 2010
    120
    10
    Loc:
    Ontario
  8. Ashful

    Ashful
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Mar 7, 2012
    8,899
    3,719
    Loc:
    Philadelphia
    Your stovepipe should be under constant vacuum, so no concern with leaking smoke into house under normal operation. In case of chimney fire, I suppose there could be a draft reversal, but then you'll have bigger problems than your adjustable elbows. Only down side I can imagine, with respect to the leakage, is a little cool air getting into the flue... almost certainly too little to matter.
     
  9. Ashful

    Ashful
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Mar 7, 2012
    8,899
    3,719
    Loc:
    Philadelphia
    A UL tag does not imply quality, efficiency, or performance... but it does guarantee the prescribed level of safety.
     
  10. corey21

    corey21
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Oct 28, 2010
    2,245
    294
    Loc:
    Soutwest VA
    I would rather have a stove that is UL listed then one that is not listed.
     
    Ashful likes this.

Share This Page