1. Jojo69

    Jojo69
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Loc:
    Pelham, mn
    Montgomery Ward Franklin heater KMF - 22017

    I am required by my insurance company to provide a UL number for my Franklin heater. Have been unable to find one and they have threatened to drop our insurance. This heater is in a cabin built about 1970. Any ideas would be appreciated.

    Jojo
     

    Helpful Sponsor Ads!





  2. pen

    pen
    Expand Collapse
    There are some who call me...mod.
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    7,722
    Likes Received:
    1,519
    Loc:
    N.E. Penna
    We are going through the same thing with our cabin. The only options are to find an insurance company that is OK with a non-UL approved stove (very few anymore) so long as the old stove follows all NFPA-211 installation guidelines (36 inches clearance to combustibles, 18 inches to ceiling from stove pipe, proper floor protection etc, etc, or upgrade your stove to a modern unit.

    About 7 years ago I went with Travelers insurance because they were OK with the non-UL approved fisher I had in the house. Since I've upgraded the stove so I'm not sure if they are still OK with the pre-UL stoves or not, but it's worth a phone call.

    Good luck.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  3. BrotherBart

    BrotherBart
    Expand Collapse
    Hearth.com LLC Mid-Atlantic Division
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2005
    Messages:
    32,424
    Likes Received:
    9,635
    Loc:
    Northern Virginia
    You aren't going to find a UL listing for it. I bought one new from Wards in 1977 and it wasn't UL tested or listed. UL didn't even create a draft standard for wood stoves until January of 1978.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  4. firecracker_77

    firecracker_77
    Expand Collapse
    Minister of Fire

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,438
    Likes Received:
    314
    Loc:
    NWI office - 2 Heritages; Chicago home - Woodstock
    Time to upgrade. From what I hear, the Franklin doesn't throw as much heat as the wood stoves do.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  5. pen

    pen
    Expand Collapse
    There are some who call me...mod.
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    7,722
    Likes Received:
    1,519
    Loc:
    N.E. Penna
    I've seen them throw a TON of heat, it's the efficiency that's lacking (and safety in many cases).

    pen
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  6. mepellet

    mepellet
    Expand Collapse
    Minister of Fire

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    2,141
    Likes Received:
    276
    Loc:
    Central ME
    Very true! The one I just removed threw a TON of heat. Would roast you out of the area in less than an hour with no slowing it down.

    Reasons for removing it:
    1. Safety - installation was not up to code. Clearances, floor construction, chimney installation all were not acceptable. Also heard of logs falling out the front and onto the floor.
    2. efficiency - can't keep a good fire going more than a couple hours.
    3. controllability - read of many franklins running away on the operator

    Needless to say, I now have a Franklin complete with chimney (minus thimble because one was not installed) for sale..... Would be nice in a camp. WHEN INSTALLED PROPERLY!!!
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  7. Jojo69

    Jojo69
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Loc:
    Pelham, mn
    Thanks for the info. Being new here it took me awhile to figure out how to reply. Our Franklin throws out a ton of heat, but it is only used occasionally as we have baseboard heat and the cabin is not used in the winter. The distance to the wall is more like 24" thus not meeting modern day code. Might try Travelers to see if they will insure.

    Jojo
     
  8. begreen

    begreen
    Expand Collapse
    Mooderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2005
    Messages:
    60,657
    Likes Received:
    7,676
    Loc:
    South Puget Sound, WA
    Sorry, the old Franklin heaters were not efficient and not very controllable either. Most of their heat went right up the flue. There is a major difference in efficiency in new stoves. It is not uncommon for folks here to report back that they are using 1/3 to 1/2 the amount of wood the used to use with their old heaters.

    FWIW, it's very common for a new stove to heat a full house on 3-4 cords of wood in northern latitudes. This sounds like a lot of opinion and little experience.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  9. webbie

    webbie
    Expand Collapse
    Seasoned Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2005
    Messages:
    12,190
    Likes Received:
    1,086
    Loc:
    Western Mass.
    My goodness...we may be incompatible here joe!

    Between these falsehoods and your new posts promoting burning plastic and garbage, I'm thinking maybe we aren't on the same page - or even in the same book or language.

    BTW, the original Franklins were nothing like the ones of today. They were down draft stoves....whereas the ones today are updraft. Completely different animals. Also, not sure if you are aware, but we've come a long way since Ben proved lightning was electricity. Now we use the stuff to cycle in BILLIONS of times per second and make these computing machines work.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature

Share This Page