1. Welcome Hearth.com Guests and Visitors - Please enjoy our forums!
    Hearth.com GOLD Sponsors who help bring the site content to you:
    Jotul Cast Iron Stoves
    Woodstock Soapstone Stoves
    Hearth and Home (QuadraFire and Harman Stoves)
  1. lecomte38 Member

    joined: Jun 6, 2008
    244 posts
    Central Mass
    It would be very nice if the moderator could set up a permanent thread in the above "sticky" area for rating, comments, and reviews of pellets. Perhaps a graph with price, heat, ash, fines, clean burn with all the pellets listed and we could vote on them.
    #1

    Helpful Sponsor Ads!



  2. midfielder Member

    joined: Dec 17, 2011
    169 posts
    NH
    x2
  3. midfielder Member

    joined: Dec 17, 2011
    169 posts
    NH
    Bump - that one landed like a lead brick :eek:
  4. jtakeman Minister of Fire

    joined: Dec 30, 2008
    12,726 posts
    Northwestern CT.
    Who's gonna do the work?
  5. JHASS Member

    joined: Dec 29, 2008
    114 posts
    Jersey Pines
    I thought there already was a sticky for someones (JTs) pellet testing.
  6. IHATEPROPANE Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 24, 2011
    800 posts
    Southern,MA
    Yes I think you are on to something.....maybe just a pellet tab with all brands listed....then people can click onon the appriopriate brand andyour write their opinions....nothing even that official with ash and heat...just a place to click on a brand your interested about and hear some opinions.....you can do the same with a search but that would be easier to navigate...especially for thise that are not regulars.
    MacP and jtakeman like this.
  7. Andy P. Member

    joined: Dec 21, 2011
    91 posts
    Central Mass.
    Sounds like a great idea. First hand non scientific reviews are very helpful in choosing pellets
  8. CtPaul Member

    joined: Sep 16, 2011
    122 posts
    CT
    But it is what everyone is always asking for!, ;)
  9. jtakeman Minister of Fire

    joined: Dec 30, 2008
    12,726 posts
    Northwestern CT.
    I like this too. An Idea for the lead off page is a poll where we can like/dislike each brand. So we don't need to scroll through all the posts and tally it ourselves.

    I am a nerd so some science is good. Don't need to get too fancy. But if some feel they can, it should be allowed. Others can just say good heat and so on. I also don't mind the lab stuff. If you find a test report from a lab, I'd say attach it. Cool beans.
  10. Woody1911a1 Member

    joined: Sep 23, 2012
    249 posts
    Marblehead , Ma
    hey i'm a fast learning newbie , but was very surprised that the premier pellet stove forum didn't have a dedicated pellet review section . using search brings you every post/thread where a particular pellet was even mentioned . a lot to sift through . and while i appreciate JT's and woodpelletreviews.com reviews , i'd like to see more hands on real world reviews even if they are less scientific .

    i've been buying bunches of different brands to try and finding wildly different ranges of results . grrr just now starting to take temp measurements .

    personally i'd like to read others impressions . after all this is a forum of pellet users . lets hear from them :)

    my opinion

    cheers Woody
  11. Bigjim13 Feeling the Heat

    joined: Jan 5, 2009
    451 posts
    Central Vermont
    Did I miss something? Didn't JT (I think that's the members name) do this? If I remember correctly he would burn a few bags of just about any pellet he could get his hands on, then post his findings. After he would clean his stove and start over. It was a HUGE thread too and I think caused some controversy but I could be wrong on that, my memory is t serving me to well on this topic.
  12. P38X2 Minister of Fire

    joined: Mar 11, 2012
    784 posts
    Jaffrey, NH
    Huge sigh from JT.
  13. P38X2 Minister of Fire

    joined: Mar 11, 2012
    784 posts
    Jaffrey, NH
    I know you wanna steer clear of MWP! There's all sorts of rocks and endangered lady slippers in those. Radioactive too.

    X4, or whatever, on the "This is a great idea" thing.
  14. fossil Super Moderator

    joined: Sep 30, 2007
    9,152 posts
    Bend, Oregon
    Well, OK, you say "All the brands of pellets". Doesn't that list change from year to year? I'm not a pellet burner, so I'm looking to you folks to educate me here. If you can devise a starting post with ground rules and set up a poll on it, and you all get it massaged around to something you like, I'll be happy to make it a "sticky". Somebody keep me informed by private convo, or whatever we call them these days. Rick
  15. smoke show Minister of Fire

    joined: Apr 17, 2008
    4,612 posts
    Pittsfield, Wi
    Don't the mojority of pellets vary from year to year, batch to batch?

    Also it's an opinion thing, unless everybody has temp probes and weighs the ash content. IMO

    flame on.
  16. Harman Lover 007 Minister of Fire

    Sounds like we are about 50/50 here on this. Thanks Mr. Mod for even considering it. Hopefully one of us will want to set something up. I expect it to have some issues due to the varying stoves and our overall individual "subjective" opinions. Having said that, I would participate.
  17. jtakeman Minister of Fire

    joined: Dec 30, 2008
    12,726 posts
    Northwestern CT.
    Yep! This is where the issues usually are. You make a negitive comment on someones favorite brand and they get a hair accross their hind end. !!!
  18. St_Earl Minister of Fire

    no problems at all with the mwp's
    never had a clinker.
    never had a jam.
    never found any foreign objects.
    burned 4.5 tons so far.
    kept us plenty warm when it was 20 below outside.

    i get 'em @ $215 per ton. delivered.
    mepellet and CtPaul like this.
  19. jtakeman Minister of Fire

    joined: Dec 30, 2008
    12,726 posts
    Northwestern CT.
    The bikering has started already! ::-)

    Taste great!--------------------------------------Less filling!
  20. IHATEPROPANE Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 24, 2011
    800 posts
    Southern,MA
    I would just add new brands to the list as they appear in the market place.


    And most of the reviews would just be user experience and very subjective but that is still useful...especially for new burners that have no idea....and if people want to take it a step further like JT even better....attach private testing results from labs better still.
  21. Redbarn New Member

    joined: Jul 30, 2012
    82 posts
    SE PA
    x 5

    When we first got our M55, I read JT's pellet testing review and used it to determine which pellets to buy.
  22. P38X2 Minister of Fire

    joined: Mar 11, 2012
    784 posts
    Jaffrey, NH
    Definitely subjective but there could be an area where the stove info is listed as well. It would also help in organizing manufacturers products. For example, NEWP is also sold as "____", "____" and "____". I've read it a million times and still can't remember.

    I think a lot of peeps have smart phones now and a sticky like this could be very helpful in a piggish moment when you're in a store and there's a ton of cheap pellets in front of you. Logic tells you to try a few bags first but the horned swine on your shoulder is saying "buy pellets!!!!". It could save a lot of time and gas $.

    This may be pushing it, but perhaps a similar sticky could be made for stoves. It would clear up the forum of generalized is this stove any good?" threads leaving it open for specific questions/issues.

    I think a key point would be to keep the comments in the proposed sticky thread somewhat short and to the point to make it more user friendly.
    briansol and IHATEPROPANE like this.
  23. TheMightyMoe Feeling the Heat

    joined: Aug 2, 2012
    419 posts
    Fairbanks, Alaska.
    I envision a whole section with a thread for each pellet brand (And those are the only brands). Each pellet with 10-40 pages of text, and more added year to year. It brings a tear to my eye...
    BrotherBart likes this.
  24. St_Earl Minister of Fire


    just a reply.
  25. UMainah Member

    joined: Jan 4, 2012
    156 posts
    Bangor, ME
    A stove review section already exists http://www.hearth.com/talk/ratings.php
    Although instead of a separate entry for every single review, I'd like to see a separate entry for each stove and all the reviews for it on that same page.

    Maybe a similar system could be implemented for pellets? Although, then we might be stepping on woodpelletreviews.com's toes, which might be an issue.

Share This Page