Wow Hog... Could your experience have been with a Soft Maple species? Actual Hard Maple -- also called Sugar, Black, and Rock maple, has the same BTU rating as oak on several websites, and an even higher rating than oak/same as hickory on other websites. That being said, a website's information does not translate to real world experience. Like you, I burn only "premium" fuel: Oak, Bitternut Hickory, Ironwood (Hornbeam), Blue Beech, and yes ---> Hard Maple. I don't notice any difference between any of these species regarding burn times or heat output (maybe it's the cat stove?). My woodshed is full of 3 and 4 year old c/s/s red & white oak right now for this coming season (with a little Ironwood thrown in). The so-called "Soft Maple" species -- Norway, Red, Silver Maples are not nearly the quality of the great Sugar Maple. I have 12 "face" cords of hard maple and 4 "face" cords of Hickory c/s/s right now for next season, and have no reservations whatsoever about it being primarily Maple, because it's the good type.
Identification is best accomplished with the leaves, but the bark and weight can also be used fairly accurately to determine hard from the others.
As for the original poster, firewood around these parts is going for $60-$70 per "face" cord of hardwood (all species); cut 16"+/- long. It sounds about right for cost, but not a steal of a deal, and would be a good purchase if it is actually Sugar Maple. I would certainly offer him less, or maybe you are not going to pursue it at all considering he has already demonstrated his unreliability.
And that concludes my $.03 worth for the day. Cheers!
"Hard" Maple is slightly more BTU than Red Oak in the charts I have seen, and slightly less to a few BTU less than White Oak.
My beef with Maple regardless of hard or soft, is the ash it leaves, and it does not last as long as Oak for my purposes.
I'll burn it, I will burn anything, but when in the heart of winter, I want good, long burning wood to keep my loading schedule on pace, and know I am going to get hours of heat without having to deal with throwing more in in between loads to get it thorough.
I won't purposely buy Maple, Walnut, Cherry, Ash etc. I tell my guy I want Oak. Now if a stick or two of any of those other species makes its way in, which is will. I have not problem with that.
But one year I got a crapload of Cherry, and really did not care for it. I had a lot of Black Walnut a few years back, and did not care for that either. Medium heat and tons of ash left over.
I am firm on letting the Oak I burn dry for 3 years, because if it is not as dry as I need it, it will become a mound of coals as you will see many have issues with.
We each have our own schedule, heating needs, loading habits etc. I myself went from loading 3x per day, every 8 hrs. to 2x a day, every 12 hours. Shoulder season is actually what may throw my schedule off, as Sometimes it will got 14-16 hrs or so, before reload, others I won't bother to burn but one load at night.
I believe this is my 9th season coming up and at this point, I love it in the beginning of the season, but mid season at best it is more routine than anything, and by end of the season, I am ready to put the Summit to bed and say nighty night till next fall. I love it, don't get me wrong, I love the savings, I love the heat. But the novelty wears off a couple months in. But I would never go back to oil, not till I am older and have had enough of wood, if that ever happens.
I still stand by my view that $70.00 for a "face" cord of Maple is not a deal I would pursue in my book. I do pole length loads and don't mess with the small stuff, unless it is a local guy I have an arrangement with.