Hi Woodburners,
I'm shopping for a new wood stove and am really glad I found this forum. I've just spent the last hour or so reading other posts and I'm feeling pretty good that I'm in the right place to ask this question, which is:
Should I get a Pacific Energy Alderlea T5 or a Super 27?
The Alderlea is about $370.00 more expensive than the Super 27, I think because it has a cast iron outer layer and a nifty cook top system. I'm trying to figure out if it's worth the extra cost. In my research (three whole hours so far) I have read that 1. There is no difference in performance between steel and cast iron; 2. Steel heats up faster and hotter, and cast iron modulates the heat and holds it longer.
Is the idea behind the two-layer Aldertea to heat up the stove fast with the steel layer, and then keep the heat modulated, and for a longer time, with the cast iron? If so, is this dual-materials system a tremendous advantage or just kinda nice?
And has anyone actually used the Aldertea's cook top system? I'm intrigued by it, because I like to cook and think it would be very cool to save energy by cooking on the woodstove since I'm going to have a fire going anyway. But I wonder why you couldn't just throw a trivet on top of the Super 27 and get the same effect? My Unimpeachable Source thinks the cook top thing is a little gimmicky. But maybe he's not a cook.
Neither of these stoves comes with EBT. Now I'm wondering if I should be feeling EBT envy, or if it's only relevant for bigger stoves with larger heat-generating capability, and I don't really need it for my 2000 sq.ft. house where winter temperatures only get down to maybe 0 degrees for a few days at the coldest part of the winter. (Don't scoff - I put in plenty of time at -40 before I moved here).
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Newbie
I'm shopping for a new wood stove and am really glad I found this forum. I've just spent the last hour or so reading other posts and I'm feeling pretty good that I'm in the right place to ask this question, which is:
Should I get a Pacific Energy Alderlea T5 or a Super 27?
The Alderlea is about $370.00 more expensive than the Super 27, I think because it has a cast iron outer layer and a nifty cook top system. I'm trying to figure out if it's worth the extra cost. In my research (three whole hours so far) I have read that 1. There is no difference in performance between steel and cast iron; 2. Steel heats up faster and hotter, and cast iron modulates the heat and holds it longer.
Is the idea behind the two-layer Aldertea to heat up the stove fast with the steel layer, and then keep the heat modulated, and for a longer time, with the cast iron? If so, is this dual-materials system a tremendous advantage or just kinda nice?
And has anyone actually used the Aldertea's cook top system? I'm intrigued by it, because I like to cook and think it would be very cool to save energy by cooking on the woodstove since I'm going to have a fire going anyway. But I wonder why you couldn't just throw a trivet on top of the Super 27 and get the same effect? My Unimpeachable Source thinks the cook top thing is a little gimmicky. But maybe he's not a cook.
Neither of these stoves comes with EBT. Now I'm wondering if I should be feeling EBT envy, or if it's only relevant for bigger stoves with larger heat-generating capability, and I don't really need it for my 2000 sq.ft. house where winter temperatures only get down to maybe 0 degrees for a few days at the coldest part of the winter. (Don't scoff - I put in plenty of time at -40 before I moved here).
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Newbie