Are these good secondaries?

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Looks like a healthy fire to me. Could probably have the air control a little more closed down to see if the secondaries sustain themselves with a little less air.
 
super good secondaries would be dancing around at the top of the burn chamber or jets of flame from 2nd burn tubes due to off gassing of the wood. depending on where your air control is set you may not have flames directly off of the wood
 
That doesn't look like much secondary combustion to me but that might just be because the smoke is being mostly burnt by primary combustion. I can see some on the top left and the left side in general is closer to full secondary combustion where the flame is detached from the logs.

The fire looks hot enough for them in the video so it might not have been turned down enough or for long enough. With good secondary combustion it looks almost like you are porting natural gas into the top of the stove.
 
You may also need to hold the camera a little closer to the ground so we are kind of looking up into the stove for a better view of the burn tubes.
I’m sure we could see them in that video if they were rolling, but I didn’t see much to say that the secondary burn was rolling.
 
Is 450º surface temp the reading on single-wall stove pipe or probe thermometer in double-wall stove pipe?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Itslay90
Something more like this where the flames are coming out of the small holes in the secondary tubes, while there may be only some small flames reaching up from the splits below. For the absolute best there would be almost no flames by the splits and all the fire is coming out of the secondaries.
 

Attachments

  • [Hearth.com] Are these good secondaries?
    IMG_0897.webp
    201.6 KB · Views: 12
  • [Hearth.com] Are these good secondaries?
    IMG_0825.webp
    81.8 KB · Views: 12
  • Like
Reactions: Itslay90
Is 450º surface temp the reading on single-wall stove pipe or probe thermometer in double-wall stove pipe?
Single wall
Something more like this where the flames are coming out of the small holes in the secondary tubes, while there may be only some small flames reaching up from the splits below. For the absolute best there would be almost no flames by the splits and all the fire is coming out of the secondaries.
nice, I’ll try to get it right now I just started a fire
 
  • Like
Reactions: GG Woody
Single wall

nice, I’ll try to get it right now I just started a fire
That is too high. It's about 900º internally. It should be reading more like 300º on single wall. Review past threads on this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Itslay90
Are you reading surface temp with a magnetic thermometer or an IR? If it’s a probe , then it’s internal, and that temp means something different than a STT thermometer stuck to a stove pipe.
Can you post a pic of the thermometer if it’s not IR?
 
Are you reading surface temp with a magnetic thermometer or an IR? If it’s a probe , then it’s internal, and that temp means something different than a STT thermometer stuck to a stove pipe.
Can you post a pic of the thermometer if it’s not IR?
surface temp on single wall with an IR gun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30WCF
it can take some practice to get the draft right. If u go to far to fast you can stall the flames, then u basically have to open up the draft and start over. At least that's how it works with my f400 and it's set up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Itslay90
Just confirming if/when you removed the baffle and swept you stuffed a rag in center secondary air tube (the one with the gasket).
 
Has a key damper been added to the stove pipe for better control of the draft?