BK Princess- with our without sides

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Hope everyone has a wonderful and warm Thanksgiving!
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
Status
Not open for further replies.

bobdog2o02

Minister of Fire
Mar 25, 2014
845
Lancaster, Pennsylvania
What purpose do the sides on BK stoves serve. I have no combustible clearance issues. I have seen some signatures here that say whatever BK stove without the sides. What is the advantage to this?
 
Last edited:
The sides will give the stove more of a convective heat effect than without the sides, where you would expect it to radiate more heat directly out from the stove.

Having gone from a radiant stove to convective and back again to radiant again, there can be a significant difference in the way the space heats, at least in my space, and the way the heat "feels" in the room.

Hope this helps, hopefully someone who has added the sides to their BK can add or explain the difference with their stove.
 
Besides whatever functional purpose they serve, I think the stove looks better with the sides on. (I need them for the clearance reduction too...)
 
I have them but don't need them. They improve the looks of the princess model since without the shields you see more of the bigmac box shape.

The side shields aren't open at the top, they tuck in under the top plate of the stove so they aren't intended to create or encourage a convection current. The heat is not lost though, it just heats up the stove faster and the thermostat can back off earlier.

Leave them on for looks, take them off if you need every bit of heat that the stove can make.
 
I have them but don't need them. They improve the looks of the princess model since without the shields you see more of the bigmac box shape.

The side shields aren't open at the top, they tuck in under the top plate of the stove so they aren't intended to create or encourage a convection current. The heat is not lost though, it just heats up the stove faster and the thermostat can back off earlier.

Leave them on for looks, take them off if you need every bit of heat that the stove can make.


Thats what i was looking for. I feel my old stove radiated more heat. Right now with the sides it does a nice job of heating the air but i dont feel like it is heating the objects in the room as well. If that makes sense......
 
Thing is, if you get the air hot enough and keep it hot, the objects will be plenty warm. All stoves have a component of radiant and convective heat production. Some make a bit more of one kind than the other. I've had inserts, stone stoves, and plate steel stoves and all of them were sized properly to make enough heat to do the job very well. You only really notice the difference when you're cold.

From a cold house, it takes a while to heat the air and then the contents of the house. After that, comfort is achieved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blueguy and jeff_t
Does removing the standard shields on the Ultra models affect the UL listing? One could assume the clearances would be the same as the unshielded Parlor and Classic models, but it might be good to find out first.

The optional shields for the Parlor and Classic models follow the shape of the sides, and aren't visible from the front. Still looks like a big mac box ;lol
 
I'm pretty sure the side shields on my Sirocco are open top and bottom. I'm not home right now, but I'll check later on when I get home...
 
The sides on my Sirocco are open at the bottom, but closed on top except for about an inch long opening towards the rear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.