I have been looking at heat load so bear with me;
I am sizing for a boiler and am trying to decide if I can do with the EKO 25 which is 85000 btu or the Tarm, Biomax, Wood Gun which are in the 130,000 + range. There is a $1000 diff between the EKO and the others, so it is an issue. So her is some figuring I have done.
My fuel usage is:
450 gal #2 average over 10 years
x139000 btu per gal
-------------------
62,550,000 btu used
x .87 eff of my burner --tested yearly by burner tec
------------------------
54,418,500 btu
div. 7500 HDD
------------------------
7255 BTU average per HDD x average # HDD per day in Jan (50) = 362,750 BTU load max
div. 24 hrs.
--------------------------
302 btu loss per hr at HDD
x 80 delta T ( 70 - -10 = 80 )
---------------------------------
24,186 BTU loss max per hour
If this is true then the EKO 25 is enough with 500 to 660 gal storage?
I am also looking hard at flat plate hx and will be interested in how that answer evolves.
Keep up the good work gang
SSfein
I am sizing for a boiler and am trying to decide if I can do with the EKO 25 which is 85000 btu or the Tarm, Biomax, Wood Gun which are in the 130,000 + range. There is a $1000 diff between the EKO and the others, so it is an issue. So her is some figuring I have done.
My fuel usage is:
450 gal #2 average over 10 years
x139000 btu per gal
-------------------
62,550,000 btu used
x .87 eff of my burner --tested yearly by burner tec
------------------------
54,418,500 btu
div. 7500 HDD
------------------------
7255 BTU average per HDD x average # HDD per day in Jan (50) = 362,750 BTU load max
div. 24 hrs.
--------------------------
302 btu loss per hr at HDD
x 80 delta T ( 70 - -10 = 80 )
---------------------------------
24,186 BTU loss max per hour
If this is true then the EKO 25 is enough with 500 to 660 gal storage?
I am also looking hard at flat plate hx and will be interested in how that answer evolves.
Keep up the good work gang
SSfein