I have been a bit curious about the need for a gasket. My previous stove had a cat but no gasket. In the end, if the cat closely fits the slot in which it sits, the fraction of gases going past the cat on the outside will be negligible?
First, always use a gasket.
Metal shims will diminish that fraction leaking past the cat, but not eliminate it (depending on the closeness of that fit)...?
The lack of an expanding (sealing) gasket does permit bypass of particulates. But all combustors monoliths and ceramic expand and contract. The interam expanding gaskets help to eliminate cracks from lack of support.
@BKVP , were measurements done of the gases in the flue with and without gasket that showed the gasket is needed?
No. Years ago we recorded that the absence of the gasket create added particulates and premature substrate failures.
Would a slight rim on the flue side against which the cat is pushed do the same (closing off the route on the outside of the cat)? Such a rim will have less thermal expansion issues than making the width of the cat fit its slot at all temperatures...? (The cat is stiffer along the short direction in which the gases flow?)
We keep the dome area free of obstruction (visa vie your lip idea) so if bypass ever needed to be removed, there would be no obstruction.
Wouldn't that be more customer friendly, not having this gasket need at all?
No. We are very friendly...put an interam gasket on your combustor!
Or maybe I am missing something here?
Just the gasket....