Dielectric unions on Bladder expansion tanks?

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Hope everyone has a wonderful and warm Thanksgiving!
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
Status
Not open for further replies.

goosegunner

Minister of Fire
Hearth Supporter
Oct 15, 2009
1,469
WI
The Bladder tanks I am adding to my system have a warning label to use dielectric fittings when connecting dissimilar metals.

I am connecting to them with copper, What do you think Dielectric union needed or no?

gg
 
I have answered my own questions with a search and some reading.

No Dielectric needed, I will do black iron cast reducer with a copper 1/2" male adapter to transition to copper.

gg
 
Used to hear people recommending a brass fitting between iron and copper to step the galvanic potential into 2 smaller steps than straight iron-to-copper.

Makes sense logically but I don't know if it's helpful to any real-world extent.

I'd like to hear an opinion on this from some of the experienced authorities around here.
 
There was a thread about this awhile ago. in my experience I have seen no need any closed-loop system to use dielectric unions. However, I like to use copper threaded into iron or steel instead of copper threaded over iron or steel. I have little use for female copper adapters.

TS
 
I researched this recently for my relocate/replumb to bring storage online. In my pressurized closed system I decided to go with copper into iron where necessary, and use brass between copper and iron wherever iron had to go into copper. This lowered the overall cost of fittings and protects those few female copper fittings I have in the loop.

From all that I read, copper into iron is not an issue except where fresh water is continually entering the system or in open systems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoilerMan
Copper threaded over iron/steel will stretch with time and leak. Copper threaded into iron/steel will not have any issues in a closed loop system, never seen a leak from galvanic corrosion in a closed loop system threaded this way. Ever.

TS

EDIT: The dielectric unions I've seen used (few) in the field that were spec'd to be there in a heating system were leaking from the plastic washer.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: STIHLY DAN
I have seen more issues on the dielectrics then I have ever seen on systems with dissimilar metals. The systems I've seen that possibly had a electrolysis problems, weren't mixed metals.
 
[Hearth.com] Dielectric unions on Bladder expansion tanks?


Went with the black iron and copper male adapters. Hoping this will work better than my air charged compression tank.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoilerMan
Why do my images show sideways now?

gg
 
Hey GG - how big are those tanks?

I am also considering swapping out for a bladder tank - maybe a project for next summer. Been thinking about how to do it since before I got my system on-line, or if I should.
 
They are Xtv 100, the label says 53 gallons. I think the acceptance is around 32 gallons.

Test run last night my start temp was 68, I might have to drain off a little to get to the temp/ pressure I normally run.

gg
 
Took storage to 182 top 160 bottom was at 22 psi. Temp at expansion tank was 160 during burn.

Gg
 
gg, you piped them up exactly how I'd have done it, black reducing coupling with copper threaded into it! Nice looking job, I like your shelving too.

TS
 
gg, you piped them up exactly how I'd have done it, black reducing coupling with copper threaded into it! Nice looking job, I like your shelving too.

TS


Thanks! hopefully I can get it all working properly after a good air purge.

gg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.