Hello, I'm still trying to narrow down my options for replacing a ZC fireplace. Wondering if those with more experience would chime in with their opinion the effectiveness of these heating options.
1) Current ZC fireplace (superior). From what I've learned so far, this likely results in little or no actual heating of the room.
2) EPA rated ZC with louvers (blower wouldn't work during power outage) Right now I'm leaning toward Supreme Astra 24, which can be installed with louvers or clean face.
3) EPA rated ZC with a clean face kit and gravity kit
4) EPA rated ZC with louvers and gravity kit
5) Wood stove (something like a Banff 1400)
Is there a significant advantage for any of the EPA options when heating without power? It seems like the gravity kit might be an advantage then? I know it won't be as effective as a wood stove, but to what degree? Thanks!
1) Current ZC fireplace (superior). From what I've learned so far, this likely results in little or no actual heating of the room.
2) EPA rated ZC with louvers (blower wouldn't work during power outage) Right now I'm leaning toward Supreme Astra 24, which can be installed with louvers or clean face.
3) EPA rated ZC with a clean face kit and gravity kit
4) EPA rated ZC with louvers and gravity kit
5) Wood stove (something like a Banff 1400)
Is there a significant advantage for any of the EPA options when heating without power? It seems like the gravity kit might be an advantage then? I know it won't be as effective as a wood stove, but to what degree? Thanks!