Hello everyone! I've lurked around here for a long while like I'm sure many before me. I'm looking to replace my old fireplace insert with an Enviro unit. I'm going back and forth on the Boston and Kodiak units. I do prefer the look of the Boston as well as the handle but the Boston is a bit more expensive than the Kodiak and overall function and cost are factors. My current home setup is a Tri-level (half ranch and half split level). So the layout currently is somewhat ...not open. This spring im enclosing my carport so after that the final size will be about 1700-1800 sq feet. I plan to use the stove pretty much every winter-I've been using my current one but just want an upgrade and something a little nicer- I live in the St. Louis area so the winters are usually cold at times. Not uncommon to see single digits overnights sometimes worse depending but usually teens and twenties on average. I originally was looking at the 1700 model for the boston unit but i seen that it seems like their sq foot coverage numbers have changed? It looks like that model will not heat 3000 sq feet which is way more that id ever need. So i was considering the 1200 instead. After talking with the stove shop guy over the phone he told me that if i can fit the 1700 in my firebox that i should just get the bigger stove. He also said that he has no idea why they up'd the sq feet of heating because he doesn't believe anything has changed about these stoves. Anyway my budget was about 3000 dollars for the stove itself give or take. So if the 1200 is the better model to go with i'd be able to swing the Boston but otherwise the kodiak is more desirable just because of price. I like the look of both stoves just fine, but the Boston is a little nicer looking so thats why i'd go for it if the price is right. It just seems to me like its not a good idea to get too much stove because of the way these things are supposed to be operated. I don't really want to overheat my home if i have family over or whatever. Thanks in advance guys!