akhilljack said:
some people might get a little bent outta shape about the chimney being 600 degrees and all but the fact is old timers have been doing that since before most people on this site were were a glimmer in there mothers eye. they never had thermometers every where and fancy this and fancy that. they just trow a few logs in and crank it up when its cold and simmer it down when its hot. but...if you burn green wood with the air shut down for 6 months and then try it when there is an afful lot of buiild up it might get out of control. there is a method to the madness, you have to do it daily, give or take so it does not get to that point. after all the chimney we all most likely have is rated at a continuous temperature of 1000 degrees and like 2000 degrees for around 20 minutes or so twice. you still have 400 degrees before you get over your operating temp of your pipe. on the other hand that is also in the days of pre-epa stove which i have found greatly different than new ones. they dont have all those baffles and crap so you can blaze the stove and it all goes up your chimeny. my osburn absorbs so much heat that if i ever got my chimney up to 600 any where my stove would be like 900 degrees. this is where the stoves start to crack and what not. my father in law has a 20 year old (at least) stove and ]the stove never gets over 400 degrees. his pipe gets considerably hotter. his flames can just shoot up the pipe and burn out the creasote before it gets dangerously thick when the damper is open and then he simmers it back down to keep even heat in the house. burning fire in homes has been around for hundreds of years and could be considered an art. with all the fancy techno-crap i think the skill and the art of fire burning has been lost to the previous generations like many other things like the value of a little hard work.
With all due respect akhilljack, I have a few words about your post.
1. I have been called an old timer more than once so I do feel qualified to give these answers.
2. Maybe a few old-timers followed your method, however, since my youth I have known only a very, very few who use or have used this method. Outside of this forum, I've known only two.
3. Perhaps your Osburn stove is a whole lot different than many others or perhaps you are not operating it correctly (please excuse if this seems harsh as it is not meant to be). On our stove we can get the stove top to 600 degrees with the flue temperature barely over 300 degrees. This seems the opposite of what you are getting. Perhaps we close the draft earlier on our stove.
4. Your father-in-law's stove never gets above 400 degrees
His pipe gets considerably hotter and his flames can shoot right up the pipe
! (Exclamation points are mine.) OMG
But then, perhaps you and he run your stoves the same way. Leave that draft wide open and this is what you will get; stove cooler than need be and pipe hotter than need be.
In order to get that stove temperature higher all you should need to do is close that draft a bit. As an example, as stated above, we can run our stove at 600 degrees and the pipe will be barely over 300 degrees. Closing the draft part way is the key no matter whether you have a cat or non-cat stove and no matter if you have a 20 year old stove or a 1 year old stove.
5. Where you state: "burning fire in homes has been around for hundreds of years and could be considered an art. with all the fancy techno-crap i think the skill and the art of fire burning has been lost to the previous generations like many other things like the value of a little hard work."
You make it sound as though you have a problem with the newer stoves. Why? Is it just because of the way your father-in-law taught you? Or perhaps you are afraid of something new or learning something new?
The skill and art of fire burning has not been lost to previous generations at all. Nor has hard work been lost. You will find many very knowledgeable people on this forum when it comes to burning wood stoves. You will also find many who actually know how to light those fires. And you will also find many on this forum who not only do work hard, but many relish the time that they do work hard. In my opinion, trying to clean a chimney by burning sounds more like forgetting the value of hard work. It is taking the lazy man's way instead of the safe and sane way.
As it states in my signature, I have been burning wood stoves for more than just a year or two. Even in my youth (back in the 40's) I heard very, very rarely about burning hot to get rid of soot and creosote. Even back then most folks shuddered to hear about people doing that. Do you really want to take the chance of a bad fire? Do you really want to chance not starting something other than your own home on fire?
As for me and my house we will refrain from chimney fires and attempting to "clean" a chimney with fire. Brushes are cheap and it is not a long time-consuming job to use them and it is much, much safer.
Once again, I hope this post is not taken wrongly. If I have worked it to sound harsh, that was not my intention. My intention was to hopefully make it a little more clear to someone who is newer to burning and hopefully keep them from making a silly mistake.
Good luck to you.