Had a sweep out to check the chimney and they're concerned about the offset - apparently it's tighter than normal.
They're coming back friday to try something different to get a regular 316 liner through it, but failing that I have a number of unpleasant choices
1) break out a bunch of perfectly good tile
2) do a direct connect
3) skip the woodstove all together
4) other things I haven't even thought of.
I once saw on This Old House a system where they stuck a bladder down a chimney and poured something like cement (Thermix maybe?) around it, ending up with effectively a 6 or 7 inch round cement tube up a rubble chimney. I already have clay tiles, but it seems like that would work too.
It seems like that would have better longevity and maybe easier to clean than a conventional stainless, and wouldn't require paying to destroy stuff. What are the pros and cons to the approach?
Thanks
Steve
They're coming back friday to try something different to get a regular 316 liner through it, but failing that I have a number of unpleasant choices
1) break out a bunch of perfectly good tile
2) do a direct connect
3) skip the woodstove all together
4) other things I haven't even thought of.
I once saw on This Old House a system where they stuck a bladder down a chimney and poured something like cement (Thermix maybe?) around it, ending up with effectively a 6 or 7 inch round cement tube up a rubble chimney. I already have clay tiles, but it seems like that would work too.
It seems like that would have better longevity and maybe easier to clean than a conventional stainless, and wouldn't require paying to destroy stuff. What are the pros and cons to the approach?
Thanks
Steve