I'm considering getting a wood burning insert or hearth stove for one of my two fireplaces for my new-to-me house to displace use the oil-fueled boiler. The house is two stories, approximately 2600 sq ft total, from the 1970's in New England. The fireplaces are basically at opposite ends of the L-ish shaped house, with the foot of the L having no second story. I'd like input on location and what to get (or what to consider about what to get). Some more details below:
The fireplace in the living room is has a second story above it, actually has furniture in it, and has a chimney that runs along the outside of the house to the peak of the roof. The fireplace in the family room actually has a wood stove in it right now, which I believe is installed illegally because it is very large. The brick underneath extends maybe a couple inches past the front of it. The family room has no second story above it and it's chimney extends above the second story windows, but not above the top of the house. This chimney is also insulated from the outside by an unheated attached garage. This room is currently empty, but I may reconsider due to getting better light in winter, or I may want to use the sun room which is off from this room. The chimney here is shared with the oil boiler. Both brick fireplaces seem the same size: about 32.5" wide x 26.5" tall opening in front with a 16.5" deep 7.5" tall brick shelf in front.
I think eventually I'd like to get something good for wood burning in both locations, but let's tackle which to do first. I'm leaning towards installing in the living room because it's below the second story, so more heat may stay in the house and be able to heat more of the house. Also, the chimney is taller and may work better.
In terms of hearth stove vs. insert, will a hearth stove do a much better job at radiating heat without a fan? It seems like you're going to get less stove size for the same opening for a hearth stove. I may want some fan system for better distribution, but I'd like reasonable backup heat for times without power if possible.
Let me know your thoughts, thanks.
The fireplace in the living room is has a second story above it, actually has furniture in it, and has a chimney that runs along the outside of the house to the peak of the roof. The fireplace in the family room actually has a wood stove in it right now, which I believe is installed illegally because it is very large. The brick underneath extends maybe a couple inches past the front of it. The family room has no second story above it and it's chimney extends above the second story windows, but not above the top of the house. This chimney is also insulated from the outside by an unheated attached garage. This room is currently empty, but I may reconsider due to getting better light in winter, or I may want to use the sun room which is off from this room. The chimney here is shared with the oil boiler. Both brick fireplaces seem the same size: about 32.5" wide x 26.5" tall opening in front with a 16.5" deep 7.5" tall brick shelf in front.
I think eventually I'd like to get something good for wood burning in both locations, but let's tackle which to do first. I'm leaning towards installing in the living room because it's below the second story, so more heat may stay in the house and be able to heat more of the house. Also, the chimney is taller and may work better.
In terms of hearth stove vs. insert, will a hearth stove do a much better job at radiating heat without a fan? It seems like you're going to get less stove size for the same opening for a hearth stove. I may want some fan system for better distribution, but I'd like reasonable backup heat for times without power if possible.
Let me know your thoughts, thanks.