This is a window in my kitchen that I had to size down so that I could have more counter top space. If it was a normal window it would look at my neighbors house and that didn't interest me. So I made one out of wind bottle bottoms and concrete.
Planeweird said:Thanks guys. It was a lot of fun to make. I have no idea what the R value is though. It's 4" thick though and about 300lbs.
Gooserider said:Planeweird said:Thanks guys. It was a lot of fun to make. I have no idea what the R value is though. It's 4" thick though and about 300lbs.
Hate to say it, but while it looks great, and is a nice creative project, the R-value is probably pretty low from the description... Concrete without any insulation in it has a pretty low R-value, and since the wine bottle bottoms are single pane in effect, that will also be a very low R... Probably better than a single pane window, but not as good as a modern high tech window or a solid wall.
Purely from a theory standpoint, what would have given a higher R-value might have been to do something like pouring a 1" layer of concrete with the bottles in place, fitting a layer of foam insulation around the bottles and then pouring another inch layer of concrete (possibly w/ some sort of wire reinforcing mesh in each pour) and cutting the bottles off flush with the top. Possibly fill the bottles with some of that clear thermo-set resin to give better insulation on the bottle glass without reducing it's transparency... If you did 2" foam, the result would probably have an overall R-value closer to a modern window, possibly even better.
Gooserider
Gooserider said:As I said, it is a neat looking project, and I didn't intend any negative criticism about it... I was just looking at it and saying what I saw from the current construction, and trying to think of a way to make it more efficient as a mental exercise... In some cases though, it is perfectly OK to decide that looks are more important than energy savings...
Gooserider
Planeweird said:Gooserider said:As I said, it is a neat looking project, and I didn't intend any negative criticism about it... I was just looking at it and saying what I saw from the current construction, and trying to think of a way to make it more efficient as a mental exercise... In some cases though, it is perfectly OK to decide that looks are more important than energy savings...
Gooserider
Oh I take it as a criticism and thanks
Hogwildz said:Might have some solar advantages to negate or even the lack of thickness.
Many Earth homes use glass bottles and they tout how green & efficient they are.
dvellone said:Hogwildz said:Might have some solar advantages to negate or even the lack of thickness.
Many Earth homes use glass bottles and they tout how green & efficient they are.
well, now I can tell my wife that my plan all along was to reduce the cost of building our new home through the over-consumption of beer and wine. Better switch quick from cans to bottles though or she'll think I'm a bigger moron than she already does.
Planeweird said:dvellone said:Hogwildz said:Might have some solar advantages to negate or even the lack of thickness.
Many Earth homes use glass bottles and they tout how green & efficient they are.
well, now I can tell my wife that my plan all along was to reduce the cost of building our new home through the over-consumption of beer and wine. Better switch quick from cans to bottles though or she'll think I'm a bigger moron than she already does.
I hear ya. That window took over a 120 bottles to make, and yes, we drank most of them
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.