I would go out on a limb and venture agues that there are two types of people using old stoves. 1, Those who have had their stoves for a long time and are either experts at using them or have used the same poor burning practices for many years and will never change their ways or 2, someone who is low on cash but needs a way to keep their family warm and has either been given an old stove or bought one for short money. Either way "just a grand" for a new Englander is not in their reality
I would add a 3rd: People who had been with woodstoves in their youth and have no clue that they also (like many other things) have seen significant improvements over time.
I have no problem with 1 and 2 continue using a classic stove but want to avoid that #3 buys one just because they are uninformed. Instead of grumbling about the EPA-stove crowd listing the benefits of a newer stove why not post the advantages of a classic stove and let the user decide which one they rather want to own?

I did have a wood stove before this, but the wife refused... (did I say REFUSED?) to touch it. I work evenings... she works days... I would load the stove before I left - she would come home to a warm cozy house and beautiful fire... I would come home at 1:30am to a cold house... a 175-degree stove.... barely an ember left to light a match from and start the process all over again.