Unfortunately the sun has set on gas engines being the quickest vehicles. They may no have the top end but given the lack of autobahns in the US and the probable demise of them in Germany, generally its the zero 60 (or 100) is far more important than top speed except for bragging I get the reason for them to get built as folks are always going to have a mid life crisis but expect the vast majority will be parked in the garage and traded when the next greatest thing comes out. I I did own a GMC Syclone for few years, it was quite impressive how all wheel drive and really wide tires could put down a lot of power without smoking the tires but expect with the horsepower they are talking about the tires makers will make a mint.
The Mazda Compression Ignition gas engine is potential a game changer. Basically a diesel cycle that runs on gas https://www.motortrend.com/news/mazda-to-launch-compression-ignition-gas-engine-by-2019/
I am rooting for Liquid Piston for the next engine. http://liquidpiston.com/ A compact rotary that in theory solves the problems with a NSU/Wankel design. Might give the 2 stroke Rotax a run for its money.
The lubricant in gasoline is Sulfur. It lubricates the fuel pump and other parts of the engine. It was Lead in the past, but we all know what happened (Lead is bad, we're all gonna die). The EPA wants to ban Sulfur from fuels (acid rain, we're all gonna die) and now the oil companies and the car manufacturers are working together to find a replacement for Sulfur with the same properties, but less bad for the environment (we're all gonna die).I have yet to see how fuel is delivered or it gets lubrication. The whole reason Wankel engines don't work is the total loss lubrication system.
The lubricant in gasoline is Sulfur. It lubricates the fuel pump and other parts of the engine. It was Lead in the past, but we all know what happened (Lead is bad, we're all gonna die). The EPA wants to ban Sulfur from fuels (acid rain, we're all gonna die) and now the oil companies and the car manufacturers are working together to find a replacement for Sulfur with the same properties, but less bad for the environment (we're all gonna die).
As I have worked in an engine lab at an oil refinery (as a petroleum chemist), I was told Lead was both a lubricant as well as an Octane booster. The problem began when the EPA banned Lead and oil companies had to find a replacement. For the Octane boosting property, Benzene and Toluene were chosen to replace Lead and they are much worse for the environment and human health. As far as the lubricant, the choice was Sulfur. When burning Sulfur, you get SO2. SO2 and rain will get us H2SO4 (Sulfuric acid) via H2SO3. So, Sulfur will be banned soon.Sulphur won't lubricate the main shaft bearings and the metal surfaces inside that rotor housing. This is why traditional rotary designs (Wankel) require oil with the intake charge like a two stroke engine.
Lead in petrol was more of a cushioning agent for the intake and exhaust valves. This was overcome with hardened valve seats. Some racing petrol blends still have leaded fuel. Old engines didn't need fuel pump lubrication as they were mechanical pumps driven by the camshaft.
I normally enjoy your posts, peakbagger, but that's the biggest bunch of BS you've ever written. The folks buying 1000 hp cars are suffering from a crisis that begins by age 16, the only thing that changes at mid-life is the budget.I get the reason for them to get built as folks are always going to have a mid life crisis but expect the vast majority will be parked in the garage and traded when the next greatest thing comes out.
I normally enjoy your posts, peakbagger, but that's the biggest bunch of BS you've ever written. The folks buying 1000 hp cars are suffering from a crisis that begins by age 16, the only thing that changes at mid-life is the budget.
The guys suffering from mid-life crises are buying 300 hp cars that look like 1000 hp cars, on one-third the budget.
Yeah usually 911s lol.I normally enjoy your posts, peakbagger, but that's the biggest bunch of BS you've ever written. The folks buying 1000 hp cars are suffering from a crisis that begins by age 16, the only thing that changes at mid-life is the budget.
The guys suffering from mid-life crises are buying 300 hp cars that look like 1000 hp cars, on one-third the budget.
Hey, 911's are awesome cars, so I can't blame them. But yeah, absolutely useless on public roads.Yeah usually 911s lol.
I have driven a fair number of sports cars on the track and I really don't like their driving dynamics. Yes they can be very fast but it takes allot more work to drive them fast and it isn't nearly as much fun. Now apparently the awd ones are very different but to get that you are talking allot more money.Hey, 911's are awesome cars, so I can't blame them. But yeah, absolutely useless on public roads.
I don't buy them I just have friends that do. And because most of them have no idea how to work on them or track prep them. Or work on anything else around their house for that matter they let me drive lots of fun stuff.People (men) buying these kind of cars need them to compensate for something.
Nope I wouldn't buy one regardless. There are lots of other cars or things I would rather spend that money on. I am just not a fan. Many are though so to each their own.You know, the 911 is a neat car. I've never owned one, but if I had infinite money and garage space, I think I would. The only real problem with owning one, as you mentioned, is all the yuppie owners that give you a bad image by association.
Nah, those guys put smoke stacks, visors, running lights and miles of chrome on their pickup trucks. Guys buying 1000 hp cars are just pure motor heads, this ain't your grandma's LT1.People (men) buying these kind of cars need them to compensate for something.
Now that I have garage space I may build a track car once I am done going over my bronco. It will probably just be a Miata but those little things are just plain fun to drive. And it doesn't take much money to add enough power to make them pretty fast.You know, the 911 is a neat car. I've never owned one, but if I had infinite money and garage space, I think I would. The only real problem with owning one, as you mentioned, is all the yuppie owners that give you a bad image by association.
Okay... that's when I'm headed over to ches bholler for a beer and some entertainment. Screw the Miata! I vote we start with the Drag Pak, they're pure evil.Now that I have garage space I may build a track car once I am done going over my bronco. It will probably just be a Miata but those little things are just plain fun to drive. And it doesn't take much money to add enough power to make them pretty fast.
Okay... that's when I'm headed over to ches bholler for a beer and some entertainment. Screw the Miata! I vote we start with the Drag Pak, they're pure evil.
j/k on the Miata, I helped a buddy do a custom turbocharger and injection on his 1990 model in our 20's.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.