- Feb 19, 2007
- 156
Part 5 of Mega-Query: Thermostatically-Controlled Air Intakes, Circulation Fan Size and and Step Top vs. Enamel Stoves
The above subhead lists the topics in this section of my Which Woodstove to Get? series.
Please see this link for specs. on the house, etc…, if you need to clarify something: https://www.hearth.com/talk/threads/6812/
Thermo.-controlled Air Intake
As far as I know, of the stoves we’re looking at, only the P.E. has this feature (part of what they call their Extended Burn Technology or “EBT”). I must say the idea is very appealing to me. I like the fact that as fuel is consumed, the draft can automatically open itself, to accelerate the burn which would otherwise simply decrease. I could see how this could lead to more complete combustion and more smoothly-regulated output.
How important do folks feel this feature is?
Also, re: this feature on the P.E. Summit, I understand that this thermo.-controlled draft is only for the secondary burn. So…what is the practical effect of having only the secondary burn thermostatically-controlled? IOW, does this mean that it doesn’t actually provide a higher heat output in the primary burn, across the duration of an overnight loading, than a non-thermo.-controlled stove?
In other words, if I close my draft down too much for the wood I loaded, at night, will the P.E. be no better at consuming that fuel than would any of the non-thermostatically-controlled stoves? Or, will the thermostatically-controlled secondary burn draft actually maintain a higher primary burn rate so that, if the wood holds out, I might see flames in the morning, and not just coals?
What other steel stoves have a thermostatically controlled air intake?
Circulation Fans: Noise vs. Effectiveness
Noise and output are what concern me. Regarding noise, I would much prefer an infinitely-variable circ. fan, that I could run as quietly as possible, depending upon conditions. To my knowledge, these are the only stoves with truly infinitely-variable fan speed controls (of the five I’m considering):
Country Canyon ST310—Infinitely variable, 700 CFM
Lopi Liberty--
Quadra-fire 5700--
Napolean 1900—Infinitely-variable,
P.E. Summit “Classic”—IS IT infinitely variable? Factory rep says “yes.” 125 CFM
To my knowledge, all but the Country use squirrel cage fans. A Country dealer who struck me as the most honest, knowledgeable, least pushy (as in, NOT pushy at all) sales rep. I ever had the pleasure to meet, told me that the Country’s fan, because it is a conventional type, (not a squirrel cage) is the quietest in the industry. Country’s literature claims that their fan is “…far quieter when compared to any other (stove) at their highest setting”.
My thinking is, that since I want, in my “Phase II,” to construct my large, heat-transfer ductwork thingy, that it might be worthwhile to have a wood stove with a 700 CFM fan as opposed to, say, a 125 CFM blower. Any thoughts on this, or on Country’s claim to have the quietest fan design?
I am willing to consider cutting in registers in,vc if need be, in order to “stick it to ‘The Man’.” LOL
Step-top Versatility vs. Beautiful Enamel Looks
Part of the rational for getting the wood stove is emergency survival. We want to be able to cook, in a power outage. If this were not the case, I would be much more into one of the two enameled stoves. (While this may seem extreme, upstate, where my cottage is, went for weeks without power, due to an ice storm, some years ago…. And it can happen anywhere in NYS.)
I am making some assumptions about Step Top stoves. Please feel free to comment upon any erroneous assumptions I have, such as:
I'm assuming that most step top stoves offer two different, but usable, cooking temperatures?
I'm assuming at least one of the two steps on such stoves will actually boil water, while the other may not?
I was told by the factory rep. for P.E. that it was not feasible to cook upon the Summit Classic, as the stove has a second top bolted to it, to give the enamel a rounded, more pleasing contour. The rep. added that some owners have taken the top off, for cooking, but that this would be impractical in a power emergency, as the stove would have to cool for 10 hours, and possibly have to be placed on its back or moved, if one did not have clearance to get to the rear bolts. (I’m sure I could get to them, but who wants to do this, really?)
The P.E. rep suggested having custom cooking pans fabbed up at a local shop, to fit the space made available by removing the trivet on the top of the stove, which is approx. 6” deep by a width obviously less than the width of the stove. I am not averse to that, but I’d like to know:
a) Do the P.E. Summit Classic and Napolean even get hot enough to boil water, on their enameled tops?
b) Do the P.E. Summit Classic and Napolean get hot enough to boil water, , in their trivet areas, with the grates removed?
c) What actual temps. do you guys and gals get, both on the enameled tops of these two stoves, and with the grates removed?
d) What actual temps do you see on EACH of the two step tops, on:
i) The Country Canyon 310
ii) Quadra-fire 5700
iii) Lopi Liberty
e) The Napolean dlr. says there is an alum. plate that replaces the trivet, expanding the cooking area approx. 1.5” on at least two sides. The theory is that it will conduct heat up from the single-walled area the trivet grate was covering, giving a hotter, larger “cook top” area. I’ve never seen one of these in person, on the web or in a brochure, but he says they exist. Has anyone used one? Do they work? Are they available? Where? How much? Has anyone used one? Do they work? Are they available? Where? ? How much? Has anyone cooked with one?
Thanks again,
Peter
>
The above subhead lists the topics in this section of my Which Woodstove to Get? series.
Please see this link for specs. on the house, etc…, if you need to clarify something: https://www.hearth.com/talk/threads/6812/
Thermo.-controlled Air Intake
As far as I know, of the stoves we’re looking at, only the P.E. has this feature (part of what they call their Extended Burn Technology or “EBT”). I must say the idea is very appealing to me. I like the fact that as fuel is consumed, the draft can automatically open itself, to accelerate the burn which would otherwise simply decrease. I could see how this could lead to more complete combustion and more smoothly-regulated output.
How important do folks feel this feature is?
Also, re: this feature on the P.E. Summit, I understand that this thermo.-controlled draft is only for the secondary burn. So…what is the practical effect of having only the secondary burn thermostatically-controlled? IOW, does this mean that it doesn’t actually provide a higher heat output in the primary burn, across the duration of an overnight loading, than a non-thermo.-controlled stove?
In other words, if I close my draft down too much for the wood I loaded, at night, will the P.E. be no better at consuming that fuel than would any of the non-thermostatically-controlled stoves? Or, will the thermostatically-controlled secondary burn draft actually maintain a higher primary burn rate so that, if the wood holds out, I might see flames in the morning, and not just coals?
What other steel stoves have a thermostatically controlled air intake?
Circulation Fans: Noise vs. Effectiveness
Noise and output are what concern me. Regarding noise, I would much prefer an infinitely-variable circ. fan, that I could run as quietly as possible, depending upon conditions. To my knowledge, these are the only stoves with truly infinitely-variable fan speed controls (of the five I’m considering):
Country Canyon ST310—Infinitely variable, 700 CFM
Lopi Liberty--
Quadra-fire 5700--
Napolean 1900—Infinitely-variable,
P.E. Summit “Classic”—IS IT infinitely variable? Factory rep says “yes.” 125 CFM
To my knowledge, all but the Country use squirrel cage fans. A Country dealer who struck me as the most honest, knowledgeable, least pushy (as in, NOT pushy at all) sales rep. I ever had the pleasure to meet, told me that the Country’s fan, because it is a conventional type, (not a squirrel cage) is the quietest in the industry. Country’s literature claims that their fan is “…far quieter when compared to any other (stove) at their highest setting”.
My thinking is, that since I want, in my “Phase II,” to construct my large, heat-transfer ductwork thingy, that it might be worthwhile to have a wood stove with a 700 CFM fan as opposed to, say, a 125 CFM blower. Any thoughts on this, or on Country’s claim to have the quietest fan design?
I am willing to consider cutting in registers in,vc if need be, in order to “stick it to ‘The Man’.” LOL
Step-top Versatility vs. Beautiful Enamel Looks
Part of the rational for getting the wood stove is emergency survival. We want to be able to cook, in a power outage. If this were not the case, I would be much more into one of the two enameled stoves. (While this may seem extreme, upstate, where my cottage is, went for weeks without power, due to an ice storm, some years ago…. And it can happen anywhere in NYS.)
I am making some assumptions about Step Top stoves. Please feel free to comment upon any erroneous assumptions I have, such as:
I'm assuming that most step top stoves offer two different, but usable, cooking temperatures?
I'm assuming at least one of the two steps on such stoves will actually boil water, while the other may not?
I was told by the factory rep. for P.E. that it was not feasible to cook upon the Summit Classic, as the stove has a second top bolted to it, to give the enamel a rounded, more pleasing contour. The rep. added that some owners have taken the top off, for cooking, but that this would be impractical in a power emergency, as the stove would have to cool for 10 hours, and possibly have to be placed on its back or moved, if one did not have clearance to get to the rear bolts. (I’m sure I could get to them, but who wants to do this, really?)
The P.E. rep suggested having custom cooking pans fabbed up at a local shop, to fit the space made available by removing the trivet on the top of the stove, which is approx. 6” deep by a width obviously less than the width of the stove. I am not averse to that, but I’d like to know:
a) Do the P.E. Summit Classic and Napolean even get hot enough to boil water, on their enameled tops?
b) Do the P.E. Summit Classic and Napolean get hot enough to boil water, , in their trivet areas, with the grates removed?
c) What actual temps. do you guys and gals get, both on the enameled tops of these two stoves, and with the grates removed?
d) What actual temps do you see on EACH of the two step tops, on:
i) The Country Canyon 310
ii) Quadra-fire 5700
iii) Lopi Liberty
e) The Napolean dlr. says there is an alum. plate that replaces the trivet, expanding the cooking area approx. 1.5” on at least two sides. The theory is that it will conduct heat up from the single-walled area the trivet grate was covering, giving a hotter, larger “cook top” area. I’ve never seen one of these in person, on the web or in a brochure, but he says they exist. Has anyone used one? Do they work? Are they available? Where? How much? Has anyone used one? Do they work? Are they available? Where? ? How much? Has anyone cooked with one?
Thanks again,
Peter
