There's about one way to do the job right, and the rest are not right. It might work... but I've priced PEX, 1 inch and 1 and 1/2 inch...
For 300 feet of 1x1, it would cost 7,100 dollars. Double that, for 14,200 dollars to run two supply and two returns.
For 300 feet of 2x2, it would cost 10,900 dollars. You only need one. Where does the increased cost come from?
Long dollar, adding pumps and more lengths of pipe...
Volume if a function of area,
The area of a 1 inch circle is .785 sq inches. Two of them is 1.57 sq inches. The area of a 1 1/2 inch circle is 1.767 sq inches.
Double the friction loss for the two inch lines, single larger diameter line under less "pressure" (velocity) can't be on the side of two 1 inch lines, "side by each".
Might need two pumps to pull off the one inch deal. Only need one with 1 1/2 inch.
And the thing will never work the best it can with smaller diameter pipe.
Of course, there are many different ways to look at things.
Insisting on two 1 inch lines... better off to run them into and out of a manifold... 1x 1 1/2 t's into and out of 1 1/2 piping connected to heat exhangers... taking two 1 inch lines and running them into a single 1 inch pipe kind of defeats the purpose...
Mushroom Man said:
I need to run hot water to a barn 300 feet from the boiler (one way). My calculations call for 13.7 gpm in that secondary loop.
1.5 inch PEX is very expensive.
Is it possible to use 2 lines of 1" with a "Y" at each end? I have never seen "Y"s except for garden hose.
I suppose a "T" would work but the loss would be large.
What kind of friction losses might be expected relative to the 1.5" pipe.
Anyone used this approach for a cost saving or am I deluding myself?