okay, at my last house, i had an avalon insert with "fresh air" tubes across the top of the firebox----once hot, the flames used to dance above the coals and there was little or no smoke coming out of the chimney (secondary burn?) and it burned very hot and consumed not much wood.
in my new house, i have a harman sf160 wood boiler----love a lot of it except the black smoke that pours out of my flue and the accompanying odor (like burning diesel or chemicals) and the fact that even after blocking off the back third of the grates in the firebox it GOBBLEs wood---4 cords per year here in sunny, scenic NJ--even with the intake door only open about 1/4-3/8". seems that most/all non gasification boiler act this way (based on what i read in the forums). gassers too expensive to justify for our short heating season here at least they were five years ago when i was doing this project.
so tell me why................... these stoves cannot be manufactured with the air tubes that my avalon had to create a hotter flame, burn gasses, and emit a cleaner discharge with a pleasant "wood burning smell". is it a cost thing as far as fabrication? it has water tubes welded across the firebox, why not air intakes as well?
or is it a technology thing; either you're a gasser or not a gasser?
is anyone making one like that (with what i am calling secondary burn)? or are any wood stoves manufactured with said "intakes" able to support a water jacket?
in my new house, i have a harman sf160 wood boiler----love a lot of it except the black smoke that pours out of my flue and the accompanying odor (like burning diesel or chemicals) and the fact that even after blocking off the back third of the grates in the firebox it GOBBLEs wood---4 cords per year here in sunny, scenic NJ--even with the intake door only open about 1/4-3/8". seems that most/all non gasification boiler act this way (based on what i read in the forums). gassers too expensive to justify for our short heating season here at least they were five years ago when i was doing this project.
so tell me why................... these stoves cannot be manufactured with the air tubes that my avalon had to create a hotter flame, burn gasses, and emit a cleaner discharge with a pleasant "wood burning smell". is it a cost thing as far as fabrication? it has water tubes welded across the firebox, why not air intakes as well?
or is it a technology thing; either you're a gasser or not a gasser?
is anyone making one like that (with what i am calling secondary burn)? or are any wood stoves manufactured with said "intakes" able to support a water jacket?
Last edited:
