Sugar maple...

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Hope everyone has a wonderful and warm Thanksgiving!
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
Status
Not open for further replies.

Kool_hand_Looke

Feeling the Heat
Dec 8, 2013
469
Illinois
Worth my time CSS'ing? Seems like I've burned a few pieces and if I remember it burned up fast. My father in law swears that it's good wood to burn. If it's not I'm not even going to waste my time with it.
 
Well worth it ... Lots of buts there.
 
I've got plenty of it. Too much of it maybe. I hate cleaning the tops when I drop them. Conservation came out and ringed a bunch of them for felling for undergrowth to come up.
 
I swear though...i thought I remember it burning up. Quick.
 
I find it burns very hot and fast if the splits are slim... hard to control. I split it thick, leave it in rounds, and/or chunk it to tame it a bit. It may depend on your stove.
 
I find it burns very hot and fast if the splits are slim... hard to control. I split it thick, leave it in rounds, and/or chunk it to tame it a bit.
Yeah I thought so. Normally I get oak, and black locust. And use sass as filler between the small spaces.
 
It's one of my favorites. There is very little I've found to start a fire faster than a bunch of 1" branches. Wonderful blue flame. It's silver maple that's the marginal wood. Sugar is full-on pretty cool stuff.
 
I have only had Sugar Maple on a few occassions and it was great-more than lived up to it's reputation. Wish I had more....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kool_hand_Looke
burns pretty good, although you will not confuse it with oak or locust. An advantage is that it can season in a year I believe. I would get it if it was easily available.
 
Maple is tough, I believe there is 142 varieties and 2 of them good long fire wood. Sugar is 1 of the 2.
 
I burn about 40% Maple, mostly red, occasionally sugar. The remainder is 40% birch and the rest mostly beech. Oak is not readily available (I am about 30 miles north of where Oak is readily available). I run a wood boiler so I want fast hot fires and maple is my preferred wood after the boiler is up to temp. I hand split about 3 or 4 cords a year and maple splits pretty easy. Definite good wood.
 
Norway, perhaps? Not as dense as Sugar but significantly more so than silver or red.

I looked up some numbers, and have to correct the above. I've read here over and over that Norway was a higher-BTU wood somewhat similar to Sugar maple, but the USDA begs to differ. The specific gravity of the dry wood, which tracks closely with BTU value, puts Norway above Silver but below Red. All of them are well below Sugar.

Typical specific gravities based on dry weight and green volume:

Sugar: 0.56
Red: 0.49
Norway: 0.47
Silver: 0.44

For comparison, on the same scale Northern Red Oak is 0.56 (same as Sugar Maple), White Oak is 0.60, Shagbark Hickory is 0.64 and Black Locust is 0.66.

These numbers refer only to the wood, not bark.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Woody Stover
C'mon Looke-are ya some kinda wood snob?!!:rolleyes: Get as much of it as you can! I agree, cleaning up the tops is a pain, but that goes along with where you'll be cutting em. I bet it's someone's yard, and you have to make sure it looks good once you're done??
"Gotta make hay when the sunshines"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Backwoods Savage
Sugar maple is hard maple. It is great firewood.

I've got plenty of it. Too much of it maybe. I hate cleaning the tops when I drop them. Conservation came out and ringed a bunch of them for felling for undergrowth to come up.

No way would I allow them to do that on our land. If you want undergrowth, simply cut the trees down.


I find it burns very hot and fast if the splits are slim... hard to control. I split it thick, leave it in rounds, and/or chunk it to tame it a bit. It may depend on your stove.

That sounds more like soft maple rather than hard maple.


Yeah I thought so. Normally I get oak, and black locust. And use sass as filler between the small spaces.

If you like oak and BL, you'll also like hard maple.
 
Sugar maple is hard maple. It is great firewood.



No way would I allow them to do that on our land. If you want undergrowth, simply cut the trees down.




That sounds more like soft maple rather than hard maple.




If you like oak and BL, you'll also like hard maple.
It's on CRP registered ground. I can't just cut down every oak I see. But the stipend at the end of the year is quite nice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Backwoods Savage
Please bare with me on this one, During the worst, coldest winter ever, the winter of 2013-2014, The one with those nasty polar vortex's an many named winter storms, the winter that tv made me scared to go outside due to climate change - end sarcasm. The majority of all the wood I burned this winter was sugar maple 5+ cords, in my opinion it was a great wood to burn, slightly less burn times but all in all it did great and it will always have a spot in my wood pile. It only took a year to season, If anything I would have split my pieces slightly larger but hindsight sometimes is not 20/20..lol
 
You might have Black maple. Acer nigrum maybe... it replaces sugar maple as you travel west.
Chimneysweep puts Sugar maple and Black locust in the same BTU output range.
AND it smells a hell of alot better when its burning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kool_hand_Looke
Chimneysweep puts Sugar maple and Black locust in the same BTU output range.
;lol That right there is why I never look at chimneysweep BTU.
 
All the tree farms and plantations out west WISHED they could grow sugar maples!!
Canada didnt stick the tree on its flag for nothing...
Cant understand why they would be tagged for cutting.
1) Were not Canada.
2) Because there's so many of them, that according to IDNR has observed the need for them to be dispatched. They do a frequency count in plant population...and decided the other trees around them like osage orange (which I can still cut them) Kentucky coffee trees, BL, and oaks are needing room to breathe.

That's fine by me. Ill prob get 3 chords of sugar maple and 7 or 8 of dead oaks and black locusts.
 
If you keep the smaller stuff (I try to use the whole buffalo ;-), give a couple 2" limbs some time to season. Then pick them up and knock them together con mucho gusto. It should produce a most satisfying CRACK! It's hard to decide between instrument or weapon... With some different lengths to make different notes, you could be in Carlos Santana's band and then be his bodyguard! ;lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.