Thought you heard it all? Storing power underwater in balloons

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Hope everyone has a wonderful and warm Thanksgiving!
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
Status
Not open for further replies.
Will this have an adverse impact by raising sea and lake levels? I think I'm kidding, but not sure. Poor efficiency could be a problem in converting electricity to compressed air and then reconverting compressed air to electricity through turbines. But the expense of an underwater storage system might be much less than some other alternative storage strategies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: woodgeek
I've heard of a similar concept using underground caverns like salt domes.
Energy companies have stored natural gas underground for some years.
 
Will this have an adverse impact by raising sea and lake levels? I think I'm kidding, but not sure. Poor efficiency could be a problem in converting electricity to compressed air and then reconverting compressed air to electricity through turbines. But the expense of an underwater storage system might be much less than some other alternative storage strategies.


If the balloons were filled with air they would certainly displace water. Whether that is enough to raise the level of the body of water would probably depend on it's size and shoreline.

I think they are using the weight of the water to give the air additional energy by pushing it out at greater force. Of course, they have to push the water out of the way in the first place. I suppose it's just a different form of battery. 60 feet has almost 4 atmospheres of pressure (1 air and 3 of water). There's a lot of pressure down there. Especially at the bottom as the balloon base is well below the 60 foot top.
 
I guess the idea is a good one. My concern is that if it works, they will put thousands of these in Lake Ontario which will then become a real problem. They did the same thing with wind turbines in many areas of Ontario and now there are thousands of them. Real estate values have gone way down in some areas because they were allowed too close to houses and many people have become wind turbine haters. All is good when things are done in moderation.
I still am against anything where the gov't pays out 10x the cost of 'normal' power generation. We have no fossil fuel generation in Ontario anymore and Ont. taxpayers pay for power that is given away to neighbours in the US. Just insane.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.