undersize vs underinsulate new flue liner

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.
A good masonry supply store should have perlite, big bags cheap.

In addition to a well-sealed blockoff plate, if you stuff some rock wool good and tight up around the liner at the bottom it will make a seal that the perlite shouldn't sift through. An easy way to put some redundancy in the system.

I'm not sure on this, but it is possible by using perlite instead of wrap that the liner won't technically be to code, since that application is probably not listed for the liner you're using.

Didn't stop me.
 
branchburner said:
I'm not sure on this, but it is possible by using perlite instead of wrap that the liner won't technically be to code, since that application is probably not listed for the liner you're using.

Didn't stop me.

If that's the case it's news to me. That liner was sold bare and could be installed bare. I've worked w/ both vermiculite and perlite and they'd do less damage to a SS liner than a cloth diaper.

Did you see this on a manufacturer's website? Code enforcement? The only problem I could see with having less than a 1/2 in insulation would be if the chimney were structurally deficient and did not meet clearance requirements on its own.?

pen
 
pen said:
That liner was sold bare and could be installed bare. I've worked w/ both vermiculite and perlite and they'd do less damage to a SS liner than a cloth diaper.

Did you see this on a manufacturer's website? Code enforcement? The only problem I could see with having less than a 1/2 in insulation would be if the chimney were structurally deficient and did not meet clearance requirements on its own.?

pen

Well, for example, on the first one I happened to pull up on google, check out the caution on page 7:
http://www.hartandcooley.com/Libraries/Product_Installation/SLK_5_to_8_Liner.sflb.ashx
CAUTION
DO NOT FILL THE SPACE BETWEEN
THE LINER AND THE MASONRY
CHIMNEY WITH LOOSE INSULATION.

And my understanding is that even if there was no caution, the liner instructions would have to specify that loose insulation is listed among the acceptable insulation applications for that specific liner. Again, I'm not sure on this - I recall it from a thread long ago, but could be mistaken.

It's the same with a stove, right? Deviation from installation specs or alteration of the stove not only voids warranty, but could violate code (if code says follow manufacturer instructions).
 
I wouldn't mess with perlite again. If you have ANY gap in your block off plate, the perlite will find a way out. All of it. I made that mistake twice. Just did some pour in thermix type stuff and it war much more forgiving.
 
nola mike said:
I wouldn't mess with perlite again. If you have ANY gap in your block off plate, the perlite will find a way out. All of it. I made that mistake twice. Just did some pour in thermix type stuff and it war much more forgiving.

Yeah, having something besides a blockoff as a backup (like the rockwool I suggested) makes things safer. Even if you start with no gap, someday...
 
Hmm. Time to do some new research. I just found the same warning on metal-fab's instal sheet.

I wonder if something has changed. I'd like to know the reasoning here. When I purchased my liner the company said that using vermiculite was just fine (last summer).

pen
 
pen said:
I'd like to know the reasoning here.
pen

CYA? Kind of like putting instructions on a hammer "do not hit self in head" so you don't get sued when someone hits self in head because NOT instructed not to.

Not that Homer would sue.
 
So Thermix is mostly vermiculite or not? If you use straight vermiculite, do you mix it with water or just pour it in dry? Since I have an external 8x8 clean out door, which will now not be used for anything because the liner is all that is in there, I definitely don't want anybody to open that door and let loose insulating material pour out. I think I need something that will solidify. Can you get that with vermiculite, or should I go with Thermix? Thanks.
 
branchburner: I think you hit the nail on the head but I'll wait to hear back from the companies I emailed.

Here is the clearance to combustibles with and without insulation guides that metal fab gives (bottom of post). I would imagine that their issue with loose fill insulation is that how much is where can't be measured and as a result they assume the worst and don't want to consider that any insulation is better than none for an otherwise safe masonry chimney that happens to have a SS liner in it. In other words, so long as the loose insulation doesn't hurt the liner, and your old chimney is sound with 1 inch clearance to combustibles, then it should be fine. Another issue they may be dealing with is the last time I tried to buy vermiculite the only chain store I found who had it was Lowes and it was laced with miracle grow. God only knows what that would do in a chimney.

Centaur: If it is OK with your liner to install vermiculite or perlite on its own, then it goes in dry. In the articles I read tonight regarding SLK and metal-fab liners I couldn't find a yea or nae regarding that type of insulation.

This stuff has been common practice for years, I want an explanation and hope to get it soon.

pen
 

Attachments

  • SS liner C2C (2).jpg
    SS liner C2C (2).jpg
    14.9 KB · Views: 456
I saved my left-over insulation for behind the stove and plan on using the rest for a block-off plate(mine as well try it to see if it is an improvement). My own 5.5" liner is only 17' and still pulls a decent draft for a Lopi Freedom (3cf) firebox. I've had 2 instances of backdraft (smoke into the hosue) that were both my fault. One I had a large box fan in the kitchen window blowing out and the other was a shoulder-season fire that just kind of billowed till I lit some paper on the top of the fire.

That must be a hell of a job to bust out a clay liner. I'm guessing regular chimney sticks wouldn't cut it.
 
centaurcoach said:
So Thermix is mostly vermiculite or not? If you use straight vermiculite, do you mix it with water or just pour it in dry? Since I have an external 8x8 clean out door, which will now not be used for anything because the liner is all that is in there, I definitely don't want anybody to open that door and let loose insulating material pour out. I think I need something that will solidify. Can you get that with vermiculite, or should I go with Thermix? Thanks.

If you are using perlite/vermiculite, just pour in dry (again, making sure it won't sift down - I actually mixed a small amount with cement to make a plug at the bottom, in addition to a small amount of rock wool).

I don't know much about Thermix, other than it will obviously cost more and it will be much harder to remove if you should ever have the need to. And more likely to comply with any code technicalities.
 
I'm leaning toward the vermiculite because I do like the option of removing this liner at some later date.

Couple more questions: 1) I like the idea of the clean out door. It is a very direct way to get a shop vac down into the bottom of the chimney. I am thinking of opening that 8x8 door and cutting a hole in the side of the liner to preserve this clean out function. Otherwise I would have to somehow clean out through a 36" horizontal snout and making a 90 degree bend to get down to the bottom of the liner.

I could make a collar of metal and cement/vermiculite mix to keep the insulation from leaking out that door. What do you think?

2) I understand I should get a nylon brush to clean the ss liner... is that right?
 
One more suggestion: instead of insulating the entire liner, maybe do just the top section, since that is where the creosote is. That could be done by stuffing some rock wool in from the top and tamping it down as far as possible (6, 8, 10 feet?) so it is tight between the tile and the liner. Then pouring in a small layer of cement/perlite to rest on top of the rock wool plug (thin enough that it could be broken out if needed). Then filling on top of that plug with loose perlite to the top.

Anyone have thoughts on that? Again, not likely to be technically code compliant.
 
The problem with the loose fill stuff is that it's tough to totally seal the gap. With a block off plate, a gap formed on both of my installs over a number of burn cycles as the liner expanded/contracted. Then the perlite all came out. With the thermix, it should set up and not run out. It actually wasn't much more than perlite/vermiculite at a local chimney installer. Also, all the vermiculite I found was for gardening and was mixed with other stuff.
 
Just to follow up. I purchased the 5 1/2 inch stainless steel liner with a 1/2 inch fiberglass/aluminum foil wrap insulation. BIG MISTAKE that last bit. There was no way this combo was going down the 7" terracotta chimney. After endless struggle on the rooftop with a man down below pulling, we gave it up. We stripped off the insulation and put in down bare.

Then, thanks to the info I gained here, I poured 4 cu ft of vermiculite down and around the stainless steel liner. Awkward, but doable. Success.

The chimney works very well. Good draft and the stove maintains 300 degrees F damped down for hours and hours. Last year with the 7" terracotta, the stove would cool much faster and need to be fired up more often to keep things going.

Thanks all. I learned my lesson and I will never try stuffing a fat wrapped liner down a skinny flue again.
 
I do hope you read the posts after mine which explained that most manufacturers don't recommend it.

After this thread, I contacted a several companies. All told me the only problem is that it hadn't been tested. None considered actually doing it a hazard or problem.

I can't see how it could hurt a damn thing unless an even layer of insulation were needed to maintain a certain clearance to combustibles that the original chimney was lacking. Even then, it would be damn hard to be sure that the pour around vermiculite mixes which set hard that are approved could be kept evenly spaced either.

I chose to do it on my chimney because of the same reason you did for the right or for the wrong.

pen
 
Pen, the chimney is on the outside of the house and there was no problem with proximity to combustibles to start with. The only problem was cooling at the top of the chimney, which has now been eliminated. Because I poured slowly and shook the liner continually, I have to believe the vermiculite is as uniform as anything else could be. Also, there is no place for it to go. My clean out door is sealed and the bottom of the chimney is filled. So I am happy and, as I said, the chimney is performing very well indeed.

Thanks again.
 
pen said:
Perlite or Vermiculite. http://www.homedepot.com/webapp/wcs...1&storeId=10051&catalogId=10053&Ntpc=1&Ntpr=1

It appears that Home Depot only has it listed in 2cu foot bags. 4 cu foot bags can be had from other retailers. Call around your area, particularly older privately owned hardwares / concrete block / brick supply houses / large garden centers. I paid only a tad more than 20 bucks for the 4 cu foot bag I picked up from an old time local hardware in my area. If they didn't have it I would have had to order it as nobody else within 75 miles carried any.

You'll have to do the math to figure out what you need. Here's a 6 cu foot back of vermiculite for $44 bux. Don't know what shipping would be. Stuff is bulky, not heavy.

http://www.amazon.com/Vermiculite-6-cu-ft-bag/dp/B0002IU95Q/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1316308457&sr=8-1

pen

This has been a most informative thread for me. I'm getting ready to pull the trigger on an 8" liner for my Buck 91 insert. Pen, thanks for the links to the HD page for the vermiculite/perlite. Is there any difference between the two for this application except the $4/bag diff in price?

Can one of you math geeks out there check my math on this because the calculations I make are different than the poured insulation calculator on Rockford Chimney Supply page: http://www.chimneylinerinc.com/insulation_kits.htm

I have a 25' chimney with 12"x12" tera cotta flue and need an 8" liner. Soooooooo....
25' x 12" x 12" gives me 25 cu ft for the vol of the flue
25' x 8" : radius 4" : pie r sq. x length gives me 3.14 x 4" x 4" x 25' x 12in/ft gives me 15,072 cu in.
15,072 cu in / 1728 cu in/cu ft = 8.72 cu ft for the vol of the liner

25 - 8.72 = 16.28 cu ft of insulation needed yet the Rockford calculator tells me I need 12.5 cu ft. I'm pretty decent at math and think I have everything right here so I'm confused about the Rockford calulator. Does this stuff they sell and mix with water swell up so I don't need as much dry volume? (their mix is crazy expensive compared to the vermiculite/perlite)

I'm pretty sure I'm going to go this route because it will save me over $200 on the cost of a insulation sleeve for my liner.

Thanks for any help on this.
 
OCD, make sure you continue to read through the post. This may not be an approved method to follow when insulating that liner.

pen
 
4 cu ft isn't much insulation, that was one tight liner. We used 16 cu ft on our chimney when we insulated our liner. I cannot see how the wet and pour insulation would flow around the liner in a tight install? Seems like there's a better chance of air pockets around the liner which could cause uneven temps up the liner.
 
BrotherBart said:
When you buy the liner get it with a "terra cotta top plate". I didn't at first and when I finally switched my two out last year I could have kicked myself for not doing it in the first place.

These guys aren't the cheapest, just to give you an idea what it is. All all the liner vendors have them these days.

http://www.chimneylinerdepot.com/st...-Deluxe-Terra-Cotta-Top-Plate-Flex-Liner.html

BrotherBart: What specifically are you kicking yourself. What is the biggest difference or advantage of the terra cotta top plate that you see. Obviously you think the money was worth it but why? Thanks
 
WoodpileOCD said:
Is there any difference between the two for this application except the $4/bag diff in price?

I was told vermiculite has more potential to absorb water, making perlite the better choice.
 
WoodpileOCD said:
BrotherBart said:
When you buy the liner get it with a "terra cotta top plate". I didn't at first and when I finally switched my two out last year I could have kicked myself for not doing it in the first place.

These guys aren't the cheapest, just to give you an idea what it is. All all the liner vendors have them these days.

http://www.chimneylinerdepot.com/st...-Deluxe-Terra-Cotta-Top-Plate-Flex-Liner.html

BrotherBart: What specifically are you kicking yourself. What is the biggest difference or advantage of the terra cotta top plate that you see. Obviously you think the money was worth it but why? Thanks

- No mess with sealing the top plate to the top of the flue tiles.

- Easy to remove for inspection or for whatever reason.

- Ya just flip it open for inspection and cleaning the liner. No screws to remove. No cap glued to the top plate collar by creosote etc. No cap rooling off the roof while you are brushing the liner. :red:

- I can tell from two hundred yards away, on the ground, if anything is starting to clog the screens in the caps.

- Chimneys just look like everybody else fireplace chimneys. No particular reason for liking that. I just do.
 
Looks like everyone else's chimney? And I took you for a rugged individualist... ;-)

Points all well taken. Thats what I was looking for. Thanks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.