What is this?

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Hope everyone has a wonderful and warm Thanksgiving!
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here

BaldyRookie

New Member
Dec 4, 2019
3
Mt Baldy, CA
I appreciate any help on this. Too white and loose to be creosote? We're new to wood burning stoves and just moved into a new place with a Defiant 1610 installed in a fireplace. Have gone through about two weeks of using it, and just discovered this pile of gray "rice krispies" behind the stove. I call them that because each grain is about that size with similar texture as the cereal. Crush it with your fingers and it resembles ash. We hear a raining noise every once in a while, and I assume it's more of it coming down. Ash in the bottom tray is nice and fluffy. We've stopped using it until I know what this is coming down the chimney!
 

Attachments

  • [Hearth.com] What is this?
    IMG_20191201_083209434.webp
    63.2 KB · Views: 221
I'm not an insert guy, which I think is what were looking at. Is that insulation that someone filled around the chimney liner.
 
It looks to me like it's fiberglass rope (like the kind used for stove door gaskets) around the liner to flat metal sheet/plate. I think rockwool is what is in the back of the fireplace brick.
 
Looks like a poorly done block off plate is leaking poured in insulation from around the liner.
 
Last edited:
It looks like loose fill perlite to me used to insulate the liner.
 
Thanks for the input- loose insulation fill makes total sense. I assume it's safe to run the stove this way until we get a chance to fix the block off plate, re-seal, and refill the insulation later? Just would lose a bit of efficiency, right?