What's the best way to shut down the firebox if things get out of control, or for any reason, you need to extinguish the fire immediately? Should closing the damper suffocate the fire? Mine doesn't.
Brian VT said:EPA approved stoves cannot, by design, allow complete closure of all air intake. Some people have devised ways around it.
The culprit is usually the secondary air intake.
woodjack said:What's the best way to shut down the firebox if things get out of control, or for any reason, you need to extinguish the fire immediately? Should closing the damper suffocate the fire? Mine doesn't.
Shari said:While EPA stoves are the current trend how in the world did the EPA approve something that can act like a runaway locomotive with no way to stop it???
The BI Guy said:woodjack said:What's the best way to shut down the firebox if things get out of control, or for any reason, you need to extinguish the fire immediately? Should closing the damper suffocate the fire? Mine doesn't.
Hello Woodjack, I guess my first question would be why you need to extinguish the fire immediately? I would hope that you called the fire department if that was the case. If not, then I would suggest that you do all you can to limit the amount of air that the fire can get. That ought to do ya. If that doesn't work, then i would certainly call the fire department
In NYC the NYFD requires either a fire extinguisher, or two buckets of sand to be in all boiler rooms.caber said:In a big emergency? Fire Extinguisher. Bucket of water. Big box of baking powder. Shovelful of dirt.
I just had to comment. I really like the way you think! :lol:woodjack said:The BI Guy said:woodjack said:What's the best way to shut down the firebox if things get out of control, or for any reason, you need to extinguish the fire immediately? Should closing the damper suffocate the fire? Mine doesn't.
Hello Woodjack, I guess my first question would be why you need to extinguish the fire immediately? I would hope that you called the fire department if that was the case. If not, then I would suggest that you do all you can to limit the amount of air that the fire can get. That ought to do ya. If that doesn't work, then i would certainly call the fire department
If my house caught fire, by the time the fire dept. showed up I'd already be trying to decide what style architecture my new house would be.
I'm not the type to watch my house burn and worry or complain that the fire dept. is taking too long. I just want to know how to extinguish a fire in my woodstove or chimney BEFORE my house becomes four cords of expensive firewood.
glenng said:While the results of putting out a wood stove fire with water can be disastrous, I have found a quick way to kill an over fire. Continuously spray a mist of water from a quality spray bottle on to the fire. 30 seconds to 1 minute of spraying will bring a raging fire to idle. I keep a spray bottle handy. I learned the trick from an old timer and it works. I had to use this method once and it worked quickly and safely. This method works for a fire in the stove. This method will not work for a chimney fire.
Shari said:Brian VT said:EPA approved stoves cannot, by design, allow complete closure of all air intake. Some people have devised ways around it.
The culprit is usually the secondary air intake.
After reading many posts on this website, I agree your statement seems to be true, however, as a future stove owner I also find this issue to be very disconcerting on so many levels! While EPA stoves are the current trend how in the world did the EPA approve something that can act like a runaway locomotive with no way to stop it??? While I also understand people with a 'runaway' can sometimes cool off their stove by shutting down the air and blowing a fan across the face of their stove to cool it off, to me this is not a good design. I am no rocket scientist but I do want control. I want a stove for all the benefits it can offer but "I" also want to control it - what is the solution????
I realize my fireplace is a hole-in-the-wall heat loss, but at least if I want to shut my fireplace down I can do so just by closing the glass doors and closing off the air intake. Why can't I find a stove that I can shut down if need be?
Shari
caber said:In a big emergency? Fire Extinguisher. Bucket of water. Big box of baking powder. Shovelful of dirt.
myzamboni said:Shari said:Brian VT said:EPA approved stoves cannot, by design, allow complete closure of all air intake. Some people have devised ways around it.
The culprit is usually the secondary air intake.
After reading many posts on this website, I agree your statement seems to be true, however, as a future stove owner I also find this issue to be very disconcerting on so many levels! While EPA stoves are the current trend how in the world did the EPA approve something that can act like a runaway locomotive with no way to stop it??? While I also understand people with a 'runaway' can sometimes cool off their stove by shutting down the air and blowing a fan across the face of their stove to cool it off, to me this is not a good design. I am no rocket scientist but I do want control. I want a stove for all the benefits it can offer but "I" also want to control it - what is the solution????
I realize my fireplace is a hole-in-the-wall heat loss, but at least if I want to shut my fireplace down I can do so just by closing the glass doors and closing off the air intake. Why can't I find a stove that I can shut down if need be?
Shari
Knowledge is power. Keep reading here on what not to do and don't put yourself in those circumstances/situations. This is your best defense. Might not be the answer your were hoping for, but just another example that wood heat is not for everyone.
The BI Guy said:caber said:In a big emergency? Fire Extinguisher. Bucket of water. Big box of baking powder. Shovelful of dirt.
Have had many years of fire fighting training in the Navy, although, we didn't burn much wood. It would seem to me that you have had far too much experience with this. 8-/
struggle said:I have heard from repeatedly that a road flare thrown into a stove will starve it of oxygen. I have yet to try it out though myself.
Cearbhaill said:Both baking soda and baking powder have been mentioned in this thread.
Once and for all- which is it?
And how much?
I am certain that it has always been baking soda recommended to me in the past, but three times here I have read baking powder.
This needs to be clarified and put in a sticky or FAQ.
IMO
Dow N. Jones said:keep a wet newspaper in a sealed plastic bag handy. plastic melts when inserted in firebox. steam released puts out the fire with less damage than dumping water in.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.