As an accomplished cheapskate, anytime I'm running the furnace (the heatpump in this case) I've always kept the thermostat as low as I could stand - 63F, on the theory that it costs more to keep the house 68 than 63.
This wasn't much of an issue in MI, because it rapidly got cold enough to crank the woodstove. But here in central PA we've had a lot more tepid days - highs inthe 40s, lows around freezing, so a lot more running the heatpump.
Now, the heat pump kicks on anytime the room temp drops more than 0.5F below the set temp, and kicks off at 1F above, so we're dealing with a small range.
So where I'm going is - would it take more energy to raise the house temp from 67 to 68 than from 62 to 63? It seems like actually maybe not. Similarly, although there's a slightly higher gradient (38F instead of 33F) across the R13 in the walls, it seems like the change in flux can't be that big.
So should I turn up the thermostat, or should I keep it low because it builds character?
Thanks
Steve
This wasn't much of an issue in MI, because it rapidly got cold enough to crank the woodstove. But here in central PA we've had a lot more tepid days - highs inthe 40s, lows around freezing, so a lot more running the heatpump.
Now, the heat pump kicks on anytime the room temp drops more than 0.5F below the set temp, and kicks off at 1F above, so we're dealing with a small range.
So where I'm going is - would it take more energy to raise the house temp from 67 to 68 than from 62 to 63? It seems like actually maybe not. Similarly, although there's a slightly higher gradient (38F instead of 33F) across the R13 in the walls, it seems like the change in flux can't be that big.
So should I turn up the thermostat, or should I keep it low because it builds character?
Thanks
Steve