KeithO said:
I suggest that by encouraging people NOT to buy Harman stoves, their fate will be sealed. .
That is certainly true of any market....but I think it has affected Harman very little. They got in trouble LAST year, and they also started building a 250,000 sq ft addition and other excesses. I heard they were planning a foundry and ordered 10 laser cutters! Considering that Travis makes due with one or two, that seems a little over the top.
Anyway, that is mostly second hand, but from employees, etc.
The point is that it is not the consumers job to make up for executive mistakes. Harman had a LOT of choices. They have many less now. Your buying a stove may allow them to pay a vendor 50% of what they owe them instead of 40%, but it certainly is not going to help them cancel their debts and obligations which are in the tens of millions - nor will it capitalize them so that they can build out as before.
Monday morning quarterback is that when demand increased they should have said "we are happy making 15,000 top notch stoves a year, and you will just have to wait for yours or buy an inferior model (my paraphrase, obviously) ". But they did not. They said "we are going to build these giant skyscrapers, buy a new airbus, etc." (again, my exaggeration)
Point is, my allegiance is to my customers (the readers). So I would rather have folks buy a known supported product. If the buyer comes out with a statement next week that all is well and settled, then my advice will change.
To address a point Goose made - "maybe VC has so many problems because they sell more", keep in mind that quite a few stove companies are in the realm (or larger) than VC when it comes to wood stoves. Anything above 10,000 stoves a year I consider the big leagues, and you can include Jotul, Quad, Harman, Travis, Regency, Englander, Lennox and maybe others in this category.