1. Welcome Hearth.com Guests and Visitors - Please enjoy our forums!
    Hearth.com GOLD Sponsors who help bring the site content to you:
    Jotul Cast Iron Stoves
    Woodstock Soapstone Stoves
    Hearth and Home (QuadraFire and Harman Stoves)
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. bag of hammers Minister of Fire

    joined: Jan 7, 2010
    596 posts
    Northern ON
    50% increase over what I have today, which heats my place. Maybe too much for me...? Say it isn't so...
    #26

    Helpful Sponsor Ads!



  2. ddddddden Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 20, 2009
    1,167 posts
    Central Va
    Depending on the "self regulating" feature, the extra capacity may simply translate into longer burn times.:)
  3. rdust Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 9, 2009
    3,339 posts
    Michigan
    Depending on what they end up using to control the a/f ratio I may be trying to explain another stove purchase to my wife. ;lol Another plus would be a stove that only requires ember protection for the hearth.
    Backwoods Savage likes this.
  4. Joful Minister of Fire

    joined: Mar 7, 2012
    2,619 posts
    Philadelphia
    A front-loading Woodstock? I'm all ears.
  5. semipro Minister of Fire

    joined: Jan 12, 2009
    1,694 posts
    SW Virginia
    I would sure like the option of installing this on my hearth but it looks too tall.
    I hope Woodstock has the good sense to provide for different height installs.
    The only reason for such long legs that I can see if to ease loading on floor level installs.
    If you're installing on an elevated hearth you don't need the long legs.
  6. rdust Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 9, 2009
    3,339 posts
    Michigan
    Not the only reason, I'd imagine the taller the stove the less R value the hearth is going to need.
    corey21, Backwoods Savage and Joful like this.
  7. Joful Minister of Fire

    joined: Mar 7, 2012
    2,619 posts
    Philadelphia
    Yep... not the comment above, in regard to ember-only protection.
  8. Jags Super Moderator

    joined: Aug 2, 2006
    11,279 posts
    Northern Illinois
    Did I hear 3.3 cuft???????

    It does have a sort of "commercial" or "industrial" appearance though.
  9. BrowningBAR Minister of Fire

    joined: Jul 22, 2008
    7,103 posts
    Doylestown, PA
    Yup!

    Unless they somehow screw this up (it looks like a 6" flue collar), this might be your solution.
  10. Jags Super Moderator

    joined: Aug 2, 2006
    11,279 posts
    Northern Illinois
    Trust me - I gotz my eyes peeled on this one. Watching it unfold.

    Get that Tom Morrissey dude on the phone, I have some suggestions.
    Backwoods Savage likes this.
  11. BrowningBAR Minister of Fire

    joined: Jul 22, 2008
    7,103 posts
    Doylestown, PA
    I'm interested as well. The VC stoves are only going to last for so long. 3.3 cu ft, 6" flue, with better air controls than the Progress sounds like it could be a great option for those that need more than the Princess but do not want the 8" connection... Like yourself.
    corey21, PapaDave and Jags like this.
  12. Backwoods Savage Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 14, 2007
    24,139 posts
    Michigan
    There will be soapstone plus steel in this stove.
  13. Backwoods Savage Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 14, 2007
    24,139 posts
    Michigan
    Well, the Progress can be made with shorter legs. Perhaps this option will also be available.
  14. Pallet Pete Minister of Fire

    joined: Nov 27, 2011
    3,178 posts
    Ovid MI
    Looks like a real beauty of a stove ! Hey maybe it will come with all the C-Clamps too I could always use those. Lol


    Pete
    Backwoods Savage and PapaDave like this.
  15. Flatbedford Minister of Fire

    I was hoping for a small one for my dining room. Still an interesting stove though.
  16. PapaDave Minister of Fire

    Just looks like the legs were an afterthought. Probably just me.>>
  17. BrowningBAR Minister of Fire

    joined: Jul 22, 2008
    7,103 posts
    Doylestown, PA
    I think the design will be tweaked before they are done.
  18. Macpolski New Member

    joined: Dec 12, 2012
    10 posts
    South Jersey
    I'm with you on this. I also have an elevated hearth, and some flexibility would be a great option. Looking to pull the trigger on a Fireview, but now I wonder if I should wait. House is 1600 sq ft. rancher with the stove on one end. Burning an Englander 13-nc and it's ok. Short burn times. Wondering?!?!
  19. PapaDave Minister of Fire

    I'm sure you're right.
    I just hope they tweak those hokey lookin' legs off of there.
    Should be an awesome stove once complete.
    popcorn.gif
  20. rdust Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 9, 2009
    3,339 posts
    Michigan
    I think it's going to keep a pretty industrial look when I read this. "The styling of the Union Hybrid stove pays homage to American Industry and Manufacturing by incorporating an industrial design aesthetic."
    I think those legs fit that description pretty good, I personally like it.
    BrianK and PapaDave like this.
  21. mfglickman Minister of Fire

    joined: Jan 17, 2012
    652 posts
    NW CT
    IMO that's really ugly. Sorry Woodstock.
    Joful and PapaDave like this.
  22. firefighterjake Minister of Fire

    joined: Jul 22, 2008
    13,472 posts
    Unity/Bangor, Maine
    Gotta agree . . . always found the Fireview and other models a little too ornate for my tastes . . . this one on the other hand is a 180 degree step in the other direction with something that is very plain Jane and a little too industrial for me.

    I still really like the looks of the PH . . .
  23. Comanche79p New Member

    joined: Dec 12, 2012
    56 posts
    Begreen, BrowningBAR, Beetlekill, this might be my answer to the stove I need. 6", rear vent?, variety of leg heights, over 3 cu ft, soapstone, cat, etc????

    I think I will hold off on my decision until I can hear more about this stove.
    Backwoods Savage likes this.
  24. rdust Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 9, 2009
    3,339 posts
    Michigan
    That's why so many different stoves are available, not everyone likes the same things. I personally don't like the look of a soapstone stove and would never own one. This one with likely have some soapstone accents which I can live with. With this stove I don't think they're going after the same customer that would buy their soapstone stoves. This will open them up to an entirely different customer base imo which is pretty smart.
    Backwoods Savage likes this.
  25. jeff_t Minister of Fire

    joined: Sep 14, 2008
    2,685 posts
    SE MI
    I think it's a bit premature to complain about looks. A few photos of a steel prototype in the test lab, and a drawing, do not represent a whole lot.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page