It sounds like fate dropped this sopastone heater into the right hands. You did a great rescue. I hope you have a lifetime of warmth from that beauty. Please keep us posted on it's operation, cleaning and heating as you get used to running it.
IThe gentleman who I got it from was a family friend and used to install these. He used this particular heater as a display for home shows. I was able to get it from his wife after he passed.
I have built several masonry heaters against an outside wall. Planned right it allows no heat loss. I have worked with several but Empire Masonry Heaters is my favorite. They cost a fraction of a Tulikivi and I can install a core in as less than 8 hours. I have actually replaced worn-out Tulikivi firebox with a long-lasting refractory one from Empire.Not really. The idea is that they have a hot, short burn with the stove mass (bricks) absorbing the heat as the gasses go through the chambers. This will burn off any creosote that might have been created during the start of end of the burn.
I spent a year looking at a masonry heater and there is a Tulikivi mason less than an hour from me. The heat/cost ratio is quite bad IMHO and the kicker for me was that they should be placed in the center of a large room. I've got the large room but do not want a stone or brick mound in the middle of it. I spoke to 3 of the top builders in Canada and they all said not to put it on an outside wall. To much heat loss. As to that is the insurance question and the cost. I dropped the idea after that.
I have built several masonry heaters against an outside wall. Planned right it allows no heat loss.
Here is one I'm building against an inside wall. If it was an exterior wall I would use a material like ceramic wool - provides zero clearance insulation.How does that work? I guess you insulate between the outside wall and the heater?
Ever do a "rocket" mass heater? Those look interesting.
I understand what you're saying. The difference is the type of thermal transfer. Quick heater output is attractive, but the thermal mass puts out infrared energy which is absorbed by everything - and everyone - in the room. It also reflects along walls, halls, and through doors. So yes, it takes a few hours to warm up but then it is the most comfortable heat you can get. I didn't believe any of it until I experienced it first-hand though.I wouldn't think performance would be the top factor for people who choose a masonry heater anyway. In terms of performance, you're making a heater out of something with (relative to steel) very poor thermal conductivity but very high thermal capacity in order to overcome short burn times- a problem which a couple modern stove companies have overcome anyway (BK, IS).
Not saying masonry heaters can't heat a house very nicely- but they trade thermal conductivity for thermal capacity. If I didn't have a BK I would probably be asking why everyone didn't do that.
In terms of aestheticics, though, there's some jawdropping masonry heaters out there. I don't usually even remotely care how stuff looks, but I've seen some that made me go 'WOW'.
View attachment 176218
The coolest wood stove on the internet. In addition to its looking cool, the big glass surface area probably allows a lot of radiant heat, which ought to help with warming up a cold house in a timely fashion.
The room the heater is in is approximately 250 sq. ft of a converted 3 season porch so it is 3 walls of glass and gets a bit cool in the winter. It is somewhat open to rest of the main floor.
I believe the heater was previously used as a display model for home home shows or something like it because it was clearly siliconed together. We got the stones through a friend of a friend who has since passed away so I don't think I will ever know the full story behind it. The stones are not in the best shape from all the years unprotected outside and likely being moved place to place multiple times.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.