I'm wondering what the size of this stove will be and if it will only be side loading
I think they are calling it 2.6. I've measured the Keystone and Fireview and found them to be about .4 usable under what the specs say. If this holds for the AS that would put it around 2.2 usable, the biggest modern stove I've had but still a good size for our place. Side loading, which I like.
These steel stoves would never make it into our house.
To each his own. I don't think
any kind of cat stove would make it into your house, would it?
Sure, a pretty stove is always nicer but sometimes trade-offs have to be made, just depends what's more important to you. Take you and being able to load east-west
and north-south. Some might say that a square stove looks kinda clunky. But I'm a function-over-form guy. I don't look at the stove much except when I am ramping it up, then I'm looking at the meters or the fire. I want an easy-to-run (read 'ash grate') stove that sips wood, can run high or low, has a welded box, and can rear-vent into the fireplace so I don't have to look at a pipe. I would even need to have 'em chop the legs off another inch to get it to fit, but that beats top-venting it and then blowing into the chimney. To me, the connector pipe is harder not to notice than a Plain Jane stove. I don't care too much about how the stove looks as long as it delivers the goods, and my wife's not gonna put the kibosh on it either, I don't think. I guess I'll have to ask...
That said, I would go with a "no wings" box and a color scheme we like, and we'll be able to live with it. There's no other size hybrid out there that's gonna work here, and none that have the features I want. I guess I could wait a while for an alternative to emerge, but I seriously doubt that would happen any time soon...this is probably gonna be the absolute best I can do. Heheh.
But tell us more about this old stove of your Granny's!