Last edited by a moderator:
Jeff Foxworthy would be proud.hmmm...I was just in the utility room and was pondering all things utility ...as you sometimes do in that room... and maybe I will put one in there as well. The refrigerators rear is exposed through the wall (did this to keep good airflow around it so the heat can dissipate easily) maybe I will make a simple vent box behind the fridge and bring the incoming cold air past the rear of the fridge. Hill billy heat exchanger!
I have not researched them much,as my cabin will never be air tight,but was thinking of one of the small outside wall mount ones,seems they have had good success except xtended -30 weather.They are more to change the air in a tight room/house/workplace so it does not become a "sick house"Hey Bob,
Funny you mention that.
I have an issue with HRV's ....mainly that I have no forced air to hook it up to and limited power to run it, no where to run ducting, and they are all made for MASSIVE houses...well massive compared to mine anyway. Not to say I don't want one...but just not practical or feasible.
I came across this:
The European perspective
Is it all much ado about nothing? That’s the impression Jesse Thompson got after speaking with representatives of (broken link removed to http://www.jotul.com/en-us/wwwjotulus/), a Scandinavian stove manufacturer.
“They say very clearly that in Scandinavia, houses with HRVs [heat-recovery ventilators] and balanced ventilation don't use outside air intakes, that it's a ‘strange Canadian thing’ that causes more problems than it fixes,” Thompson says. “They mentioned the same issue as Martin: backdrafting into your fresh-air intake is disastrous and a real fire hazard.
“The idea is that if you have a balanced ventilation system, your house will be at the same internal pressure as the outside, and you won't get the strong pressure differentials that can create back-drafting. As well, they quoted very low cfm needs for the combustion in modern EPA stoves, I remember 15 cfm? In any case, it's much lower than a big tube through your wall would be providing and doesn't need additional supply beyond normal house leaks.”
Oh I put that guy to shame. I probably put his second cousin from down in the "holler" to shame.Jeff Foxworthy would be proud.
These are quite separate issues. The stove oak should be relatively close to the stove, within 10-12', to avoid friction losses in the intake pipe.hahaha...you know..."them"
I just read it somewhere....
I guess my main concern is that if I put the intake across the room I am going to be feeling all that cold air running past my feet...making me feel cold. Which kinda makes the wood stove pointless.
If I put the air intake really close to the stove I won't get much fresh air exchange into the house. (which is good and bad depending on how you look at it)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.