I've read a number of threads on this subject already and have made a 'casual study' of the Magic Heat reclaimer (and one of its competitors).
I'm aware that essentially ANY cooling of the flue is apt to promote additional creosote build up. Also that the reclaimer designs available don't allow for ready clean out of accumulated creosote.
But... I'm inclined to think there must be some way to extract usable heat from a flue pipe that is running routinely at (say) 500-600* not far above the stovetop, without a 'deal breaker' trade off.
I'm toying with some ideas I might try that wouldn't impede exhaust flow or constrict flue pipe diameter, but that *might* radiate more usable heat than an 'unadorned' flue pipe... so far pretty straightforward stuff in terms of design... if not execution.
An example being a enuine_ heat sink of cast aluminum with multiple vertical fins radiating a few inches away from the black pipe. Likely expensive... but possibly (at least plausibly) effective.
Anyone care to weigh in with ideas?
Thanks.
Peter B.
-----
I'm aware that essentially ANY cooling of the flue is apt to promote additional creosote build up. Also that the reclaimer designs available don't allow for ready clean out of accumulated creosote.
But... I'm inclined to think there must be some way to extract usable heat from a flue pipe that is running routinely at (say) 500-600* not far above the stovetop, without a 'deal breaker' trade off.
I'm toying with some ideas I might try that wouldn't impede exhaust flow or constrict flue pipe diameter, but that *might* radiate more usable heat than an 'unadorned' flue pipe... so far pretty straightforward stuff in terms of design... if not execution.
An example being a enuine_ heat sink of cast aluminum with multiple vertical fins radiating a few inches away from the black pipe. Likely expensive... but possibly (at least plausibly) effective.
Anyone care to weigh in with ideas?
Thanks.
Peter B.
-----