Are these chaps any good? Do I need any?

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Hope everyone has a wonderful and warm Thanksgiving!
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
Status
Not open for further replies.

Dmitry

Minister of Fire
Oct 4, 2014
1,200
CT
Just picked up a pair myself this year. It's like safety glasses there only good if you have them on. $55.00 on Amazon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lone_Gun
I have Husky chaps in orange that look like them best I can tell. I'd say any chaps are better than no chaps, I haven't really tested mine except a small 1.5" cut in the cover at ankle height
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TreePointer
I think you should wear chaps just as if the trees were standing or otherwise. (Like wearing your seatbelt on your daily commute, just like on long trips.)

Advice people gave me was any chaps are fine as long as UL certified (as Lowes says these are) and comfy enough that you will wear them every time.

That said, I'll confess that sometimes I don't wear chaps on occasions that I use my electric chainsaw, since they say the torque curve of the electric motor is too much for the chaps to stop. Still, I usually wear them anyways since it's probably better than jeans vs. electric chainsaw and it's a good habit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: D8Chumley
I go back and forth. . . I will wear my chaps for a few weeks then I get lazy and do not. . . . I am currently trying to be vigilant and wear them all the time. . . . id look for a pair of ''wrap chaps'' they wrap around your calf and ankle for extra protection down in that area. . . also go if you are cutting in the summer time b/c that's where your copperheads and rattlesnakes want to nail you
 
Do you have house insurance? Car insurance? Even Life insurance?

Chaps are just another form of insurance, trying to insure your bodily parts from some kind of accidental introduction to the chainsaw.

I never go shooting without my eyes and ears, I never use my saw without my chaps.

As for those ones in particular, they don't wrap all the way around the calves. Accidents are funny things, they happen in the most inopportune ways, so having something that protects only part of your leg is not as good as something that wraps around the whole calf for more protection.
 
No you don't need them if you have a good life ins. for the better half or a real good health care package
You don't need them until you need them then it's to late
 
  • Like
Reactions: D8Chumley
You only need them if the chain is rotating on the bar and it touches your leg at the same time.
 
Ok , I guess it's better to use them not knowing why you need them than not use them and find out once why you should have wear them every time .
 
  • Like
Reactions: johneh
These are cheap insurance & made in USA.
(broken link removed to http://www.labonville.com/Full-Wrap-Chainsaw-Safety-Chaps-Parts-_c_80.html)

I have these and love them.

Remember that your chaps should be long enough to cover your metatarsal, this is very important when it comes to keeping your feet on your feet if you don't have chainsaw boots and extra protection if you do.

For example: I wear 34" length pants but I wear 36"length chaps
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TreePointer
The cost (ER visit, pain & suffering, lost wages, loss of limb, death) is too high not to wear chaps. I wear them every time I run a saw.

+1 on Labonville full-wrap chaps. Solidly made in the USA.

As mentioned, make sure to follow measurement directions. The inseam on my jeans is 32", but measuring from the top of my belt to my instep is 39". The 40" chaps fit me perfectly.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: D8Chumley
Status
Not open for further replies.