I read Windhager is offering installation and maintenance classes with the purchase of a pellet boiler, this is right up my alley. Anyone here have a Windhager pellet boiler, and if so what do you think of it?
I read Windhager is offering installation and maintenance classes with the purchase of a pellet boiler, this is right up my alley. Anyone here have a Windhager pellet boiler, and if so what do you think of it?
I am thoroughly impressed with the Model 210 Exclusive I am burning.
The last 5-6 weeks have been cold around here. More than a few nights below 0 and we got above freezing for the first time in about 23 days just last week. 21 and snowing as we speak here today.
During that time period my natural gas fired Viessmann would down between $280-$330 of fuel according to my records. Our gas totals out to right around $.85 per therm and the local price of wood pellets puts them just above that cost per btu so I was really curious whether there would be any savings with pellets at all.
I had a hunch there would be some advantage because the Windhager has the ability to modulate down to only 30% firing rate. This turned out to be a larger factor than I anticipated. In terms of fuel $$ spent the cost of operation for the Windhager through that time period was $211.68 for 56 bags of pellets. (Locally $3.78/bag-$189/ton)
All other things being equal I would have to say that the BioWin operates at an honest 15-20% cheaper than natural gas does. This of course will vary with the local prices for each fuel. I would say it is safe to assume a savings of 40-50% compared to LP gas and 60%+ for fuel oil.
The boiler ramps up and down beautifully to meet changing loads in the house and will sit there and burn clean at minimum output all day long. There is no expensive Lambda sensor involved because the fuel is so consistent it is not needed. The engineering dept. seems to have the algorithm nailed as far as working good at all firing rates between 30-100% as I never see more than a couple percentage points difference in efficiency on the combustion analyzer. There is a trace of smoke occasionally at startup and that is it. There is no smoke at all while in operation and once in a while some steam seen when atmospheric and temperature conditions are right.
The burn setup they use is a true primary/secondary air mix with primary air coming in right on the fuel pile and secondary air coming in on top of the fire for a very clean burn. I took the ash container out to check it this week because I thought it would need to be emptied after burning 1-1/4 tons of pellets. I was wrong. There was a total of maybe 3 quarts of ashes accumulated in the container. Virtually nothing is left after combustion.
A person could not ask for a more convenient and easy way to use an alternative fuel. If it takes me more than 3-4 minutes per week to "operate/load" the boiler that would be a stretch. The Windhager makes a very compelling case for pellets rather than cord wood if you are looking for minimal time invested or don't have access to "free" wood.
EDIT: Flue gas temperature is a good baseline indicator of efficiency for any appliance and I have to mention what I see with the BioWin. I would not have believed it without seeing and measuring it with my own eyes. At 100% firing rate and water temp of 170-180* range the flue temp will max out at 235-240*. That's maximum. At firing rates of 30-60% the flue gas will drop down to within 15-25* of the water temperature and just stay there. I have seen it run all day without getting the flue gas temp above 200-210*. Efficiency measured on the analyzer has shown a minimum of 83% and a maximum of 89%.
How many years for the payback, 10+? Seems like staying with natural gas would be the way to go.
Tim
View attachment 97296
Just got a notice from the utility company today that natural gas for the next year will be roughly 15% less than it was this year.
I swear that a nationwide build out effort for natural gas pipelines would be the best economic stimulus program that could be done. It would leave more jingle in everyone's pocket at the end of the month and the construction of all the pipelines running to small towns everywhere would provide countless jobs for a very long time. The environmental benefits would undoubtedly be significant.
Probably makes too much sense for our politicians though.
One another note though, back to the OP's topic, here's a picture of the Windhager I am burning as we speak. I think you'll be able to make out the water temperature (right hand gauge @ 176*) and the digital display showing the flue gas temp (195*). The output (firing rate) at the time of the picture was 43% or about 32,000 btu. This is extremely low for a flue gas temp and would cause major issues in a cordwood fired boiler. After running this thing for the last 6-8 weeks I would have a very hard time convincing myself that cordwood was worth the extra time and effort involved in my case.
what's your heat distribution system look like? how fast is the modulation and or shutdown?
Just remember the immortal words of Gil Carlson who headed up B&G's tech department for years. "What goes into a tee, must come out of a tee".
Thanks for the pic Heaterman, would like to see one of the other side. I'm talking with marc about installing one here in maine, we need to iron out the piping (installed in parralel with wood boiler) and I need to line my masonry chimney with stainless because of condensation.
Chimney vented with Class A pipe (to eliminate any possibility of corrosion). Windhager wants to see a negative .02-.04 wc" draft on it. The primary reason is to be able to vent any CO if there should be a power outage or the like. This is of course something that is not talked about much by many manufacturers and/or installers but needless to say is a very important consideration. If the boiler shuts down for any reason, whatever reason, where are the combustion gases going to go if they can't vent outside naturally?
As for burning corn is concerned........I think we can all forget about corn as fuel unless we have the land to grow our own and can afford to forgo selling it for $7.00 or so a bushel. If you are rich enough to be able to burn corn at that price why would would a person use alternative fuel in the first place?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.