Installing Wood Burning Insert vs Refurbishing Existing Fireplace

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.

Tars

Member
Jul 17, 2022
7
NJ
Hey guys,

I am trying to decide whether or not to install a flush mounted wood burning insert or refurbish my existing fireplace. Had a level 2 chimney inspection and the sweep noted that I would need to redo the interior of the chimney approx $3500-4000 or I could skip that and do the flush mounted insert. I want an alternate heat source potentially but do not want to sacrifice too much aesthetically or be required by code to put a metal/stone landing over the brick that already exists on the floor. I have hydronic baseboard heat and ductless mini-splits for AC, which also produce heat. My thought is I might not need an alternate heat source if I simply install a generator to keep the boiler/mini-splits going in a winter outage. I have a tapered firebox inside the fireplace, but based on the dimensions I probably could get a medium insert in. I will get a another fireplace consultation but was wondering if anyone had any advice based on the aesthetic and dimensions of the fireplace. I was thinking of installing a non-catalytic Lopi or Regency.

  • Front width: 37″
  • Rear width: 26″ (tapered)
  • Opening height: 28.5″
  • Depth: approximately 22″
  • Brick hearth extends 26″ into room
Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • [Hearth.com] Installing Wood Burning Insert vs Refurbishing Existing Fireplace
    tempImageTFeSzd.webp
    123.6 KB · Views: 0
  • [Hearth.com] Installing Wood Burning Insert vs Refurbishing Existing Fireplace
    tempImage5QaZXv.webp
    141.4 KB · Views: 0