I have been fretting about the "lucrative" Net Metering Laws implemented by our state legislators having a risky future, and I am expecting this to become an issue here in another 5-10 years:
http://www.greentechmedia.com/artic...tail-Rate-Net-Metering-for-New-and-Existing-S
The highlight of the article is this:
"The (Nevada PUC) decision increases the fixed service charge for net-metered solar customers, and gradually lowers compensation for net excess solar generation from the retail rate to the wholesale rate for electricity, over the next four years. The changes will take effect on January 1 and will apply retroactively to all net-metered solar customers."
I am struggling to get my finances together to get a large enough solar array on my house to offset the use of both myself and my parents home. A 10Kw array under present Net Metering would cover my bill and reduce my parent's by 50-60%. I can get my parents bill reduced even though they live in the next town because NYS allows me to apply any of my excess Net Metered credits to my parents electric bill.
The sticky issue is if the politicians amend the Net Metering laws, my entire analysis is out the window. I presently pay about $0.22/Kwh for total electrical bill. That breaks down to about:
$0.10/Kwh for grid delivery (trans & distrib),
$0.09/Kwh for power supply (generation),
$0.01/Kwh for taxes (state & local),
$11/month fix meter charge.
If the rules change and my potential "over-production" is seen as a sale to the grid and credited at only the "power supply" rate, my ROI or payback would be impacted severely.
I've fretted about this and have argued both sides of the Net Metering debate, but never thought about this trifecta: raising the basic monthly and shifting from retail to wholesale and making it retro.
I'll be keeping an eye and ear open for this here in NYS. This mole needs wacking quick.
http://www.greentechmedia.com/artic...tail-Rate-Net-Metering-for-New-and-Existing-S
The highlight of the article is this:
"The (Nevada PUC) decision increases the fixed service charge for net-metered solar customers, and gradually lowers compensation for net excess solar generation from the retail rate to the wholesale rate for electricity, over the next four years. The changes will take effect on January 1 and will apply retroactively to all net-metered solar customers."
I am struggling to get my finances together to get a large enough solar array on my house to offset the use of both myself and my parents home. A 10Kw array under present Net Metering would cover my bill and reduce my parent's by 50-60%. I can get my parents bill reduced even though they live in the next town because NYS allows me to apply any of my excess Net Metered credits to my parents electric bill.
The sticky issue is if the politicians amend the Net Metering laws, my entire analysis is out the window. I presently pay about $0.22/Kwh for total electrical bill. That breaks down to about:
$0.10/Kwh for grid delivery (trans & distrib),
$0.09/Kwh for power supply (generation),
$0.01/Kwh for taxes (state & local),
$11/month fix meter charge.
If the rules change and my potential "over-production" is seen as a sale to the grid and credited at only the "power supply" rate, my ROI or payback would be impacted severely.
I've fretted about this and have argued both sides of the Net Metering debate, but never thought about this trifecta: raising the basic monthly and shifting from retail to wholesale and making it retro.
I'll be keeping an eye and ear open for this here in NYS. This mole needs wacking quick.