Firstly, thanks for all of the info in these forums.
I did a quick search and couldn't find anything on my particular topic so here goes.
I have a PE Pacific wood insert. The stove works great and I feel that is pretty much perfectly sized for my home. However, I would like to be able to limit the air intake more than is currently available. With the damper fully closed I feel that there is a little too much air entering the box. This is causing shorter than possible burn times and also a lack of full control of a full load of wood.
Now, I understand that the stove must be fed sufficient air to allow secondary burning for emissions (as well as optimum heat output) reasons. The reason that I feel that a little more restriction would be beneficial is that shortly after the fire is first started (or a new load of fuel is added) I close that damper fully and have a nice, rolling secondary burn visible above the fuel and no smoke from the chimney. This is how I have always maintained the burn in other stoves with excellent results regarding both heat output and low smoke/creosote. As that new fire reaches temperature in my Pacific, the secondary burn becomes almost "hurried" looking and seems to flare quite a bit when compared with that nice rolling flame that I am used to.
1. Is the situation that I am describing what is actually desired by EPA standards and the stove manufacturers?
2. Are there more BTU's/longer burn times to be obtained from a reduction in air the the box is allowed without the fire becoming smokey/producing excess creosote?
3. Any suggestions on how this could be done on my particular insert?
All suggestions and advice are appreciated.
Thanks.
I did a quick search and couldn't find anything on my particular topic so here goes.
I have a PE Pacific wood insert. The stove works great and I feel that is pretty much perfectly sized for my home. However, I would like to be able to limit the air intake more than is currently available. With the damper fully closed I feel that there is a little too much air entering the box. This is causing shorter than possible burn times and also a lack of full control of a full load of wood.
Now, I understand that the stove must be fed sufficient air to allow secondary burning for emissions (as well as optimum heat output) reasons. The reason that I feel that a little more restriction would be beneficial is that shortly after the fire is first started (or a new load of fuel is added) I close that damper fully and have a nice, rolling secondary burn visible above the fuel and no smoke from the chimney. This is how I have always maintained the burn in other stoves with excellent results regarding both heat output and low smoke/creosote. As that new fire reaches temperature in my Pacific, the secondary burn becomes almost "hurried" looking and seems to flare quite a bit when compared with that nice rolling flame that I am used to.
1. Is the situation that I am describing what is actually desired by EPA standards and the stove manufacturers?
2. Are there more BTU's/longer burn times to be obtained from a reduction in air the the box is allowed without the fire becoming smokey/producing excess creosote?
3. Any suggestions on how this could be done on my particular insert?
All suggestions and advice are appreciated.
Thanks.
And plus is St. Valentines Day is just around the corner. I can put a bow on, and tell the OL to oepn me up and eat some candy 