Ok fellas , I need some advice/opinion here.
I have a Regency 2400 series insert, and it is my first woodstove. (1350 sq ft cape style home: circa 1913 in Maine,USA)
The first year we used it, (came with the house we bought), the wood I ordered turned out to be more green than we were led to believe, and so I wrestled all season to keep a fire going..very frustrating & made for sloooow & weak fires..low heat etc
My in laws have a smaller 80's Garrison, that's like 1/2 the size & outputs twice the heat! grrr
I began to think I really wanted a freestanding model, so I could benefit from more heat, rather than rely on a blower-based model.
If my goal is simply to offset my oil bill as much as possible, In general do you experienced folk find either style stove to be simply throw more heat?
Any comments are appreciated.
I didn't find an exact discussion previously had, and so I hope I'm not duplicating a thread.
Cheers!
Rich
I have a Regency 2400 series insert, and it is my first woodstove. (1350 sq ft cape style home: circa 1913 in Maine,USA)
The first year we used it, (came with the house we bought), the wood I ordered turned out to be more green than we were led to believe, and so I wrestled all season to keep a fire going..very frustrating & made for sloooow & weak fires..low heat etc
My in laws have a smaller 80's Garrison, that's like 1/2 the size & outputs twice the heat! grrr
I began to think I really wanted a freestanding model, so I could benefit from more heat, rather than rely on a blower-based model.
If my goal is simply to offset my oil bill as much as possible, In general do you experienced folk find either style stove to be simply throw more heat?
Any comments are appreciated.
I didn't find an exact discussion previously had, and so I hope I'm not duplicating a thread.
Cheers!
Rich