I have been thinking about this for quite some time and will be leaving for Florida in the next week or two but I may want to modify our flue when we return.
We burn a non-EPA VC Defiant stove (circa 1979) into a firepace with a 10x10"(id) flue. The stove exhaust is 8" so we barely meet the '2 x X' requirement for exhaust and flue diameter. There is a stop at the throat and at the face of the fireplace too.
Everything works great except we get at the top 4-6' of the flue a thin creosote buildup which we keep under control by adding TSP in the stove weekly. The flue is about 12' to the throat and about 1/2 of the masonry is in the adjoining garage and the last 6' has 3 sides exposed to weather. There is an adjoing flue from the oil boiler in the basement.
The creosote buildup is very minimal and stays consistantly about the depth of a fingernail but it is gooey creosote. We burn well seasoned oak, so please don't go down that path. All non-EPA stoves have some creosote buildup and I am not looking for comments as per stove replacement... unless you want to pay for the stove and installation.
I read a recent article by John Gulland about restricting the top part of the flue (restrictor plate) for run-a-way EPA stoves. He gave a good description of the pros and cons and that it may be out of compliance per EPA and may cause roll-back problems. But in our application it may work to keep hotter flue temps and avoid some creosote buildup
I have some scrap sheet metal to fabricate pipe and plate(s) to reduce the rectangle 10x10 to 8-9" round for the top 3' of the flue for the experiment and if it works out will do it correctly. We live on the 39.37Nth parallel in southern NJ so fairly mild winters.
I would like to know if others have tried this with any success and of course we are looking for suggestions.
Thank you in advance,
Jim
Addit/Edit: We burn 24/7, retired and very happy with our stove.
We burn a non-EPA VC Defiant stove (circa 1979) into a firepace with a 10x10"(id) flue. The stove exhaust is 8" so we barely meet the '2 x X' requirement for exhaust and flue diameter. There is a stop at the throat and at the face of the fireplace too.
Everything works great except we get at the top 4-6' of the flue a thin creosote buildup which we keep under control by adding TSP in the stove weekly. The flue is about 12' to the throat and about 1/2 of the masonry is in the adjoining garage and the last 6' has 3 sides exposed to weather. There is an adjoing flue from the oil boiler in the basement.
The creosote buildup is very minimal and stays consistantly about the depth of a fingernail but it is gooey creosote. We burn well seasoned oak, so please don't go down that path. All non-EPA stoves have some creosote buildup and I am not looking for comments as per stove replacement... unless you want to pay for the stove and installation.
I read a recent article by John Gulland about restricting the top part of the flue (restrictor plate) for run-a-way EPA stoves. He gave a good description of the pros and cons and that it may be out of compliance per EPA and may cause roll-back problems. But in our application it may work to keep hotter flue temps and avoid some creosote buildup
I have some scrap sheet metal to fabricate pipe and plate(s) to reduce the rectangle 10x10 to 8-9" round for the top 3' of the flue for the experiment and if it works out will do it correctly. We live on the 39.37Nth parallel in southern NJ so fairly mild winters.
I would like to know if others have tried this with any success and of course we are looking for suggestions.
Thank you in advance,
Jim
Addit/Edit: We burn 24/7, retired and very happy with our stove.