Roospike said:
Thats 12 gallons in 24 hours ..........I'm sure that is rated for HIGH that i dont think you are running. So one would think that 6 galons in 24 hours is med setting . What setting are you running it at ? Its like anything that is rated ........ a wood stove that is rated at 55,ooo btu is not going to put out 55,ooo btu on low or even med. The best bet like a lot of things is getting the higher rated unit and run it lower so you dont have to push it to get what you want. ( except A/C units that need to be correct rated per sq ft of a home ) We run our Kenmore unit on low and keep the 1800 sq ft house at 48%-53% . But i'm sure the higher you run stove the less % you are going to get from your kenmore. ALSO , if you sit back and think about it ....... when the Kenmore was rated it was not in "real world" settings like most things AND when rated there was NO woodstove. Also as we know ( most of know ) that heating with say natural gas it adds moisture into the air. Before we bought our new wood stove for our new house the first year we heated with natural gas and the humidity in the home in the winter was around 60% all winter with no humidifier. Bought the new wood stove and the humidity with out the running the humidifier was in the 30%-36% range. We already had the Kenmmore humidifier but didint have it set up the first week. Just my thoughts ........
Sometimes it's hard to figure out what someone is trying to say on this danged internet. Here, I'm not sure if I'm being baited or taught a life lesson.
Spike, I wasn't trying to 'dis' the Kenmore if that got your hackles up, and I'm tempted to feel a bit insulted, but will refrain as I suspect you meant no offense. I'm a formally trained systems analyst and while I really didn't gain much intuitive insight regarding comparative analysis conclusions from that program, I did learn how to select metrics and structure such tests, and I always had a knack for drawing accurate intuitive conclusions, even though measurements sometimes provide counter intuitive results. That's why I'm taking and recording the measurements.
I am testing at each and every (fan) setting level of the humidifier. Several days on high (fan = 4), several days on medium (3), soon to be several days on 'annoying' (2), and finally I'll try it on 'acceptable' (1).
I'm recording actual Kenmore humidity settings and room humidity levels with a digital humidistat, a wet-bulb/dry-bulb thermometer with relative humidity chart, and two analogy mechanical humidistats. I'm taking temperature readings at multiple locations throughout the house. I'm recording the locations of all measurements for both Kenmore display and humidistats (there have been several locations for both, to tweak things). Having said that, my primary metric on the Kenmore is: 'How many gallons of water does it consume in a 24 hour period'. I chose this metric because it is stated with certainty on the Kenmore product. This should allow apples to apples comparisons with Kenmore's (Sears') claimed performance vs. my measurements, real world skewing not withstanding.
My house is larger than yours so it will obviously be more difficult to raise the humidity throughout. That is why I have four humidifiers (three currently operating). I certainly understand about higher stove firing levels reducing the humidity more than lower firing levels, but that will have no effect on the 'gallons consumed in a 24 hour period' metric, at least no negative effect. In fact, with the lower relative humidity created by higher firing and the accompanying higher temperature in the Kenmore room, the Kenmore should consume MORE water, not less! Anyway, I considered that in my test.
After reading the mandatory but marginally helpful Consumer Reports information using their online subscription search feature, I suspect the Kenmore's performance (or lack thereof) may be affected somewhat by my slightly hard water. Although they claim that the evaporative wick designs are less subject to hard water performance degradations that other designs. It probably has some effect, anyway.
BTW: as I understand it, heating with natural gas will reduce humidity levels, not increase them, unless you are using a non-vented appliance. Your previous measurement was likely either inaccurate (that's one reason I'm using 5 different humidistats) or your experiment was somehow flawed in its design.
I do agree with you about buying a bigger humidifier appliance and running it at a lower speed. Unfortunately, this is the largest of the newer designed Sears models with the digital controls, which I prefer. At least, it's the largest listed on their web site. Perhaps I should take another trip to Sears. I almost remember them having a 16-gallon model although I wasn't interested in that large of a unit at the time. Who would think I'd need to put more than 12-gallons of water into the air (I figured they fudged, but only allowed for about a 25% inaccuracy of their claims, not 50%). If the 12-gallon model consumes 6-gallons per day (on high), the 16-gallon model should consume around 8-gallons per day (on high). But it would need to possess a larger fan for this to be true. That's a significant increase and might be worth it if they'll let me trade this one in. And of course, I'd measure things in a real world environment just to prove it to myself.