Steel or Porcelain?

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Novice

New Member
Oct 26, 2013
18
Toronto, ON
Hi all,
I'm looking to purchase a pacific energy wood burning stove, and I'm wondering if you would recommend the plain steel or the porcelain-coated finish? (I.e. the Super 27/ Super step-top vs. the Spectrum Classic). I want to be able to cook on the stove top, and I want a finish that is durable, rust-resistant and easy to clean...any suggestions? Also, anyone have any bad experiences with these models? Thanks!
 
If good looks and easy to clean are priorities then I would go for the porcelain finish. It cleans up quickly with just a wipe of a damp rag.
 
Then again, you can always repaint a steel stove. Porcelain, not so much. Scratches are permanent once you get them.
 
We have a Jotul F600 in the Majolica brown porcelain finish and it is a very beautiful stove. I would not consider cooking on it, or even placing a pot of water for humidity due to the porcelain being able to chip and scratch. When I got the stove brand new it already had 3 or 4 chips on it that I had to use touch up paint on as soon as I got it home. After seeing that I would be afraid to be sliding pots and pans around on the finish. It would be fine if it was a used stove in your basement and you didn't particularly care that much about the finish, but if it's going to be a new stove like ours and a focal point of the room it's in, then I'd say don't risk it. Go with the flat black paint that will be easy to repaint every year or so.
 
I went through the same thing last year. I really like the looks of the enamel finish but it isn't going to be as bullet proof as plain steel. You'll have to determine the degree of abuse it may get and go from there. If you don't mind a few chips or cracks on the surface, and strongly prefer the look of the enamel, you'll probably be fine with it. It would be easier to clean. But if you cook on it very often, it's bound to get roughed up sooner or later.

OTOH, how much cooking will you really be doing on it? A lot of new owners including myself aspire to cook on the wood stove, but it usually ends up being a novelty that soon wears off because it's really not that easy or consistent.

As far as those models, they are highly regarded here. No bad experiences that I can recall.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.