I'm still looking to replace my Jotul 100 with something with a bit more capacity and discovered that the 3cb has a marginally larger firebox.
The Morso 2b classic has a firebox capacity about the same as the 3cb.
My question;
doesn't it stand to reason that, firebox capacities being equal, a long firebox design with "end" loading will hold more wood than a front load design because of the manner in which the splits are loaded?
In other words, it's a bit more difficult to utilize the full capacity of a front load stove without carefully stacking the splits so they won't tumble out. And of course, if you reload before the wood has burned down much you run into the tumbling ember escapade.
I've seen it mentioned that the 2b classic is a tiny stove but it should easily hold as much and probably more wood than the 3cb. Right?
Is anybody familiar with the actual burn time and performance of this model?
The Morso 7100 also has appeal as it's in the same price range as the 3cb yet has a larger firebox. Any thoughts on this one?
The Morso 2b classic has a firebox capacity about the same as the 3cb.
My question;
doesn't it stand to reason that, firebox capacities being equal, a long firebox design with "end" loading will hold more wood than a front load design because of the manner in which the splits are loaded?
In other words, it's a bit more difficult to utilize the full capacity of a front load stove without carefully stacking the splits so they won't tumble out. And of course, if you reload before the wood has burned down much you run into the tumbling ember escapade.
I've seen it mentioned that the 2b classic is a tiny stove but it should easily hold as much and probably more wood than the 3cb. Right?
Is anybody familiar with the actual burn time and performance of this model?
The Morso 7100 also has appeal as it's in the same price range as the 3cb yet has a larger firebox. Any thoughts on this one?