The Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E)

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

vinny11950

Minister of Fire
May 17, 2010
1,794
Eastern Long Island, NY
Ok, the agency in general is fine, but their budget for coming up with clever acronyms needs to be cut. The consistency of relevance acronyms to the work is unbelievable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sprinter
Ok, the agency in general is fine, but their budget for coming up with clever acronyms needs to be cut. The consistency of relevance acronyms to the work is unbelievable.
Acronyms and buzzwords are here to stay but boy is it hard to keep up with them sometimes. And no doubt they are often way overdone and unnecessary. Those within a particular project or industry have a chance, but they do leave out a lot of public, and it's public money they need to attract. It's all I could do to keep up with those used in my field which was heavily acronymed and buzzworded (if that's a word). Sometimes I think it's a way to separate the insiders from the outsiders, to feel a bit superior, but often just alienate the folks they need to educate the most.

They do serve a purpose, of course, for those within a project, but I can't count the number of professionals within my industry that have had to have some terms explained even though their positions are closely related. I guess it's just a result of growing specialization, but I do wish they were a bit more self explanatory and obvious as to their meaning.

Now that I'm retired, it's much harder to keep up, but that's my problem...
 
Acronyms and buzzwords are here to stay but boy is it hard to keep up with them sometimes. And no doubt they are often way overdone and unnecessary.

I'm just poking fun at them. In some groups, there seems to be a compulsive need to have an acronym for a project.

I'm digging through a pile of aerospace standards at work right now. They range from having multiple pages of acronyms defined for use in the following sections, so that it's almost impossible to keep track of all of them, to having none of the acronyms they use defined, so I have to look in other documents for hints what they might be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sprinter
Status
Not open for further replies.