One month. Check the link.
http://www.grit.com/animals/solar-wood-drying-kiln.aspx#axzz2lUvXq6T6
Lets here it.
http://www.grit.com/animals/solar-wood-drying-kiln.aspx#axzz2lUvXq6T6
Lets here it.
The kiln design looks reasonable, but neither the the original article nor the followup makes any mention of their having checked the MC using any objective method at all. That, plus the facts that they go through 9-12 cords a year and normally only season wood for 9-12 months make me suspect their standards for what constitutes "dry" are substantially lower than what is typically espoused here.
Do you have a link to your thread Augie?Simple solar kiln using cheap clear sheeting has gotten me from new burner with no wood to 5cords ready to burn in one year. During the spring summer and fall it took about 90days to go from wet to 20%mc. I mentioned this last spring, gave my results in the fall in a few threads and like many in this thread I was questioned for my honesty. It works, really well. I tent up a cord or two at a time, the move the sheeting in 90 days. I will never have to have more than 1-2 years worth of wood on my lot moving forward.
The naysayers in this thread are just old and cranky, I imagine many of you here in your yard with a clenched fist raised in the air waving it about shouting "Damn kids get off my lawn"
Do you have a link to your thread Augie?
Do you have a link to your thread Augie?
You can just Google "site:hearth.com augie solar kiln" and get a bunch of hits.
Augie, it looks like your initial experiment took some oak from 52% to 18%. Given that electronic meters are extremely inaccurate above 28% or so, how did you establish the 52% starting point?
They are not that inaccurate
Up at that MC level they are absolutely "that" inaccurate. When wood is above the fiber saturation point (around 28%), there is liquid water present and the resistance is so low as to be difficult to measure, while the normal errors due to factors like species and temperature and other vagaries of the particular chunk of wood you're dealing with become overwhelming. The most a meter can tell you about wet wood is that split A is probably wetter than split B, assuming they're the same species and at the same temperature. The particular numbers it might spit out are not remotely reliable.
I don't see anyone claiming that a solar kiln doesn't speed drying, but the time frame you're not sure about is the whole ball game.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.