Hello! I'm new to the forum, and hoping some of you knowledgeable folks could offer some answers or insight into my fireplace (because Google search seems like it just keeps getting worse and worse!)
I've been in the house for 2.5 years, it was built in 1930 and is located in Northeastern Oklahoma. It has a basement and one main floor. The fireplace seems to be extremely shallow and I believe potential modifications over the years are adding to my confusion. I think it's a beautiful fireplace, and I wish the previous owners hadn't painted over it, but it is what it is.
There are two chimneys in the house; one which exits the roof and is the exhaust for the water heater and furnace. The other chimney (which is part of this fireplace) was decommissioned at some point, and extends into the attic to a foot or two below the roof. So at some point in the houses history, this fireplace was exhausting flue gas.
In the basement, beneath the fireplace, there is a gas line which leads to the hole in the floor of the fireplace. On the main floor, just to the left of the fireplace in the floor, is a shutoff valve. So at one time there was natural gas being burned, and at one time (maybe the same time, maybe not?) there was flue gas exiting through the roof. But now, the back of the fireplace curves upwards towards the top of the fireplace, and it's completely blocked off from the chimney. My theory is that the back of the fireplace was added to block off the chimney in an aesthetically pleasing way, due to the inefficiencies of the old system.
But there are a few inconsistencies with that theory. In the second picture, you can see the brick on the side of the fireplace is nested partially under the brick that forms the archway (highlighted in red). If this brick was added after the original construction, that would mean that brick on either side would have been cantilevered, which I have a tough time believing. The other option is that the side brick was original, and the only modification was the back brick to block off the chimney, except the side brick and back brick appear to be the exact same dimensions. I know brick size is mostly standardized, but I would be surprised if 1930 brick was the exact same size as 19-whenever-they-closed-off-the-chimney brick. Unless maybe they used the brick salvaged from decommissioning the chimney?
I would love to one day add a small ventless fireplace. I've learned ventless gas fireplaces can be pretty controversial, and in this house it would be used for occasional brief ambiance/comfort. But the dimensions of the fireplace aren't very accepting of most ventless gas fireplaces available. Furthermore, I'd have to remove the latex paint and re-coat with high heat paint, which seems like a nightmare.
Any advice or insight would be greatly appreciated!
I've been in the house for 2.5 years, it was built in 1930 and is located in Northeastern Oklahoma. It has a basement and one main floor. The fireplace seems to be extremely shallow and I believe potential modifications over the years are adding to my confusion. I think it's a beautiful fireplace, and I wish the previous owners hadn't painted over it, but it is what it is.
There are two chimneys in the house; one which exits the roof and is the exhaust for the water heater and furnace. The other chimney (which is part of this fireplace) was decommissioned at some point, and extends into the attic to a foot or two below the roof. So at some point in the houses history, this fireplace was exhausting flue gas.
In the basement, beneath the fireplace, there is a gas line which leads to the hole in the floor of the fireplace. On the main floor, just to the left of the fireplace in the floor, is a shutoff valve. So at one time there was natural gas being burned, and at one time (maybe the same time, maybe not?) there was flue gas exiting through the roof. But now, the back of the fireplace curves upwards towards the top of the fireplace, and it's completely blocked off from the chimney. My theory is that the back of the fireplace was added to block off the chimney in an aesthetically pleasing way, due to the inefficiencies of the old system.
But there are a few inconsistencies with that theory. In the second picture, you can see the brick on the side of the fireplace is nested partially under the brick that forms the archway (highlighted in red). If this brick was added after the original construction, that would mean that brick on either side would have been cantilevered, which I have a tough time believing. The other option is that the side brick was original, and the only modification was the back brick to block off the chimney, except the side brick and back brick appear to be the exact same dimensions. I know brick size is mostly standardized, but I would be surprised if 1930 brick was the exact same size as 19-whenever-they-closed-off-the-chimney brick. Unless maybe they used the brick salvaged from decommissioning the chimney?
I would love to one day add a small ventless fireplace. I've learned ventless gas fireplaces can be pretty controversial, and in this house it would be used for occasional brief ambiance/comfort. But the dimensions of the fireplace aren't very accepting of most ventless gas fireplaces available. Furthermore, I'd have to remove the latex paint and re-coat with high heat paint, which seems like a nightmare.
Any advice or insight would be greatly appreciated!
